Sergio Marchionne Is Alarmed By FCA's Sudden Canadian Downturn, And Rightly So

sergio marchionne is alarmed by fcas sudden canadian downturn and rightly so

With Jeep as the fastest-growing auto brand in the country and Ram pickup truck sales soaring to record levels, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles was Canada’s top-selling automobile manufacturer in calendar year 2015.

It was the first year in the company’s 90-year history that FCA (or DaimlerChrysler, or Chrysler Group, or whatever it was known as) outsold all other manufacturers.

Yet in claiming the top-selling mantle, FCA’s Canadian market share decreased marginally, falling from 15.6 percent in 2014 to 15.4 percent in the automaker’s highest-volume year to date.

Fast forward nine months and FCA boss Sergio Marchionne finds the company’s Canadian situation, “alarming,” according to Automotive News Canada. How bad is it? And how did the tide turn so quickly?

MARKET SHARE


In the third quarter of 2016, FCA Canada’s market share plunged to 12.7 percent, a deep dive from the 15.1 percent reported during the same period one year ago. Q3 volume plunged by more than 13,000 units, a 17 percent year-over-year loss.

The Canadian market is most definitely slowing. But it’s not like the industry ran into a brick wall.

Across the industry, including FCA, sales fell 2 percent in Q3. Subtract FCA from the equation and Canadian auto sales actually increased 1 percent in Q3, adding nearly 5000 sales in large part thanks to all-time record Ford F-Series sales.

VOLUME


Marchionne told ANC that, “We’re not out to chase volumes just to get numbers into the fold here,” a statement that will surely humour (yes, with a u) Canadian industry observers who’ve watched for years as FCA chased volume.

FCA produced one-quarter of its volume via fleet sales during the five-year period stretching from 2011 to 2015 and made a practice out of advertising $7,000 or more in Grand Caravan discounts.

But producing that volume — and earning a profit at the same time — is becoming more difficult for FCA because of a Canadian dollar that’s much weaker now than it was five years ago. Essentially at par with the U.S. dollar as recently as April 2013, one Canadian dollar now buys only USD $0.75.

CURRENCY


This works out well for FCA’s assembly plants that build the Dodge Charger, Dodge Challenger, Chrysler 300, Dodge Grand Caravan, and Chrysler Pacifica in Brampton and Windsor, Ontario.

Selling cars in Canada, however, is another matter.

In 2013, FCA was selling, for example, a CAD $40,000 pickup truck in 2013 that was worth roughly $40,000 U.S. dollars.

Today, that CAD $40,000 sale equals only USD $30,000.

FCA is obviously less willing to make that deal, resulting in lower incentives and higher prices that drive buyers to rival showrooms.

BLUE OVAL


Ford Canada, meanwhile, stepped on the incentive throttle pedal in September in order for the F-Series to outsell its three top-selling truck rivals combined. “We’re not concerned with how the truck is priced in the U.S.,” Ford Canada’s product manager for trucks told TTAC in late September, clearly revealing Ford Canada’s willingness to counteract currency issues with increased volume.

Back at FCA, the automaker trailed Ford Canada by a 20,372-unit margin heading into the fourth quarter. General Motors Canada unexpectedly managed to outsell FCA’s Canadian division in August and September, as well.

Canada is disproportionately important to Fiat Chrysler’s North American operations. The Canadian auto industry generates 9.6 percent of North America’s total auto sales volume. FCA produces 11.0 percent of its North American volume in Canada.

[Images: FCA, TTAC]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Oct 25, 2016

    Consumer Reports coming back to haunt FCA?

  • Danio3834 Danio3834 on Oct 28, 2016

    Much of this is due to truck allocation going to the U.S., and maxed out production not being able to fill Canadian demand. When it comes down to where to put the sale, it'll go to the more valuable dollar.

  • 285exp I am quite sure that it is a complete coincidence that they have announced a $7k price increase the same week that the current administration has passed legislation extending the $7k tax credit that was set to expire. Yep, not at all related.
  • Syke Is it possible to switch the pure EV drive on and off? Given the wonderful throttle response of an EV, I could see the desirability of this for a serious off-roader. Run straight ICE to get to your off-roading site, switch over the EV drive during the off-road section, then back to ICE for the road trip back home.
  • ToolGuy Historical Perspective Moment:• First-gen Bronco debuted in MY1966• OJ Simpson Bronco chase was in 1994• 1966 to 1994 = 28 years• 1994 to now = 28 yearsFeel old yet?
  • Ronnie Schreiber From where is all that electricity needed to power an EV transportation system going to come? Ironically, the only EV evangelist that I know of who even mentions the fragile nature of our electrical grid is Elon Musk. None of the politicians pushing EVs go anywhere near it, well, unless they are advocating for unreliable renewables like wind and solar.
  • FreedMike I just don’t see the market here - I think about 1.2% of Jeep drivers are going to be sold on the fuel cost savings here. And the fuel cost savings are pretty minimal, per the EPA: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&path=1&year1=2022&year2=2022&make=Jeep&baseModel=Wrangler&srchtyp=ymm&pageno=1&rowLimit=50Annual fuel costs for this vehicle are $2200 and $2750 for the equivalent base turbo-four model. I don’t get it.
Next