Volvo Readies Small Car Revival, Trademarks V40 Name in U.S.

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Volvo is determined to make a splash in the U.S. small car market when the next-generation 40-series cars arrive, and it’s already laying the groundwork.

The Swedish automaker filed a trademark application for the V40 name on August 31, paving the way for a five-door hatch that will ride atop the company’s new compact modular architecture (CMA).

The current V40, billed as a “small family car” by the automaker, has been sold overseas since 2013, and recently saw a styling refresh to hold it over until the next-generation models arrive. An earlier version of the model, with proper wagon proportions, left the North American market in 2004.

Failing to offer the current V40 in the U.S. was “a mistake,” senior vice-president for research and design Peter Mertens told Automotive News in March. Mertens blames the failure on Volvo’s past financial troubles.

Now surging, the automaker wants to complete its turnaround by introducing a compact sedan, wagon (or five-door) and crossover to the U.S. market. That announcement came in May, after the automaker introduced two 40-series concept vehicles — the 40.1 and 40.2. The concepts lay out the design direction of the next-generation 40-series vehicles.

There’s a new drivetrain waiting for them. Volvo’s T5 Twin Engine drivetrain sees a 1.5-liter three-cylinder engine and electric motor work together through a seven-speed dual clutch transmission.

Volvo CEO Hakan Samuelsson told Automotive News that the 40-series vehicles will arrive in the U.S. within three years, though the automaker claims the first offering should start production in 2017, likely as a 2018 model. Interestingly, Volvo trademarked the C40 badge last November.

Many believe that the new compact Volvo crossover will carry an XC40 badge, but that might not be the case. The automaker’s focus will be on the models it feels will be the most lucrative, and crossovers and hatches take precedence over a sedan (which will no doubt carry the S40 name). An S40 trademark hasn’t been filed in the U.S., implying that the crossover and hatch will land on these shores first.

[Images: Volvo Car Corporation]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 42 comments
  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Sep 07, 2016

    A "Volvo" without a greenhouse is not a Volvo.

  • Tnk479 Tnk479 on Sep 07, 2016

    Please yes. Chinese ownership seems to be doing great things for Volvo. The XC90 looks great and I can't wait to see what the new XC60 and V40 look like. BMW is desperately hard trying to lose my future business. If no luxury automaker can get it's act together then I guess I will just buy a Civic Touring appliance and save/invest the difference.

    • Barksdale Barksdale on Sep 07, 2016

      Chinese ownership = money to do the things the Swedish designers and engineers want to do (and and are capable of). American ownership under the Ford genius bean counters that starved the brand was a disaster.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next