Elon Musk and Top Tesla Exec Stage Angry Man Speaking Tour

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The dialogue from Tesla wasn’t all rainbows and puppies this week.

In oddly coordinated diatribes, CEO Elon Musk and his vice-president of business development took off the soft driving gloves and laid into their competition and the country’s regulators. The message? Put up, pay up, or shut up.

At a Michigan industry conference on Tuesday, Diarmuid O’Connell raked other automakers over the coals for not building enough electric cars. And the ones they do build? Nothing but “kitchen appliances,” he said, according to Forbes. Too small of a range, and to high a price, he added. That adds up to very few vehicles sold.

“The industry is not even trying,” O’Connell said.

O’Connell then slammed the Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board for not updating their regulations to force automakers to develop more zero emissions vehicles. (California law calls for 15 percent of its fleet to be ZEV by 2025, and automakers who fall short with their product line must buy credits to offset the thirsty fleets.)

Naturally, the rest of the industry picked up the glove and slapped back, arguing that consumers should drive the market, not regulators. “Fuel efficiency is important, but at a price people can afford,” said Wesley Lutz, a representative from the National Automobile Dealers Association.

Fast-forward one day, and Tesla’s CEO launched into a similar tirade during an earnings call. Musk wants CARB’s emissions credits program overhauled, because he feels the regulations aren’t spurring EV sales.

“The California Air Resources Board is being incredibly weak in its application of ZEV credits,” Musk said, according to Bloomberg. “The standards are pathetically low. They need to be increased. There’s massive lobbying by the big car companies from increasing the ZEV credit mandate, which they absolutely damn well should. CARB should damn well be ashamed of themselves.”

What’s going on here? Is this legitimate anger we’re seeing, or just grandstanding and PR? Some might say that Tesla’s soapbox is so high, it can’t see the 200-mile Chevrolet Bolt EV that will launch a year before Tesla’s first affordable electric, the Model 3. Other automakers, including Ford, Nissan and Hyundai, are also preparing 200-plus-mile EVs for launch within a couple of years.

It sounds like Tesla’s EV for the masses will have competition when it arrives. As it stands now, the cheapest Tesla is the newly downgraded Model S 60 that retails for $66,000 (before government incentives).

The EPA, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and CARB are in the midst of a review of their 2025 fuel economy targets. In a preliminary technical report, the agencies said automakers made great technological strides towards achieving the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) goal of 54.5 miles per gallon. To reach the goal, the agencies claim only two to three percent of the country’s fleet would need to be electric by 2025.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 82 comments
  • JD321 JD321 on Aug 07, 2016

    The political terrorists are not going to continue their fatwa against the ICE automobile until after the slaves vote for their Masters in November. The circus barker Musk wants them to step up the pace in order for Tesla to survive. It's that simple...Only stupid people don't understand this.

    • See 1 previous
    • VoGo VoGo on Aug 07, 2016

      A JD321-to-English dictionary of common terms: - political terrorist = someone with opinions different from my own - fatwa = posts - slaves = voters - the Masters = leaders of the political party I do not support - circus barker = CEO - stupid people = everyone not friends with me, i.e., everyone

  • JD23 JD23 on Aug 07, 2016

    JD321 and I are not the same person.

  • Redapple2 .......I sometimes roll my eyes at Nissan’s branding of its seats as “zero gravity” but they were super comfortable................. Respectfully disagree. I think it s a catchy unique name that instantly describes why you want it. AND is most likely woefully lacking in the car in you garage.
  • Jkross22 Tens of people will be disappointed.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Basically a Qashqai/Rogue Sport that looks like the new Rogue, but with the Kicks name.
  • Fred I guess this also competes with the Honda HR-V. I'm driving a 2021 and this offers a few improvements, hopefully the driver assists work better, bigger screen, maybe nicer seats. I trust Honda more than Nissan for reliability. I'd miss the magic seats. And then there is the extra $5000 or so it would cost me.
  • Arthur Dailey 143 different interior options! I realize that is now untennable, but still would like more options regarding interior colours, including the instrument panels/dashboards. Black on black is depressing. Drum brakes and no HVAC system. And yet we have 'young whippersnappers' complaining about some modern vehicles being 'penalty boxes'. Try driving a family around in a 1960's stripped VW Beetle during a Canadian winter and then you can start talking about penalty boxes. ;-)Personally that final picture of the red coloured car with the 3/4 view shows it to be just beautifully proportioned. Still retains the P-38 styling finishing in those attractive vertical tail lights. And the horizontal chrome trim along the bottom of the trunk lid adds a nice touch.
Next