Will an Outsider Build a New Defender? Over Our Dead Body, Says Land Rover

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Jaguar Land Rover isn’t about to have some upstart company build a new version of its iconic Defender.

The automaker shot back at rumors of a third-party resurrection of the boxy, beloved SUV, Autocar reports, stating that the previous-generation model will remain dead and buried as the company crafts a new model.

The Defender ceased production earlier this year, ending a production run that began in 1983. During that time, the SUV became a rugged favorite, findings fans ranging from African adventurers to Queen Elizabeth II.

Rumors and media reports stated that Jim Ratcliffe, founder of the chemical company Ineos, planned to restart production of the first-generation Defender in an undisclosed English locale. There had even been talks between him and Jaguar Land Rover executives, the stories claimed.

“There is no way this is happening,” a JLR spokesperson told Autocar. “We’re not going to let anyone build our Defender.”

In an official statement, the automaker said: “We can confirm there are no plans to restart production of the previous generation Defender … The Defender remains a key part of our future product strategy, and the development of the next-generation model remains on track.”

The next-generation Defender is expected to ditch the previous model’s body-on-frame architecture and adopt an aluminum unibody. The new model, several variants of which are expected to be sold in the U.S., should appear before the end of the decade.

Despite JLR’s statement, Ratcliffe seems to want to have the last word on the issue. Today, the tycoon said his company is working on a feasibility plan for returning the old Defender to production, albeit with upgraded safety equipment and emissions controls.

“I am a great admirer of the Land Rover Defender and I think it can be upgraded to be the world’s best and most rugged off-roader,” Ratcliffe told Autocar. “We want to breathe new life into it and make it even better than before.”

The “new” old model would be built in northern England near a port facility with a £250 million investment, he said, adding that there could be copyright issues to deal with. Ratcliffe’s comments suggest he would build an export market knock-off using engines from another manufacturer, a plan that JLR would likely fight tooth-and-nail.

The British automaker recently filed a lawsuit against a Chinese manufacturer that sells a knock-off of its Evoque SUV.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Johnster Johnster on Jul 18, 2016

    Having an outsider take over and continue an existing model worked so well for the Lotus Super Seven when Caterham took it over, or for the Avanti. OTOH, it didn't turn out so well for Saab.

  • DownUnder2014 DownUnder2014 on Jul 19, 2016

    It's almost a shame they are discontinuing these without a successor (for now), even if it's successor is radically different to the classic one. They don't have an old-school 4WD left after the Defender gets discontinued.

  • Jkross22 Sure, but it depends on the price. All EVs cost too much and I'm talking about all costs. Depreciation, lack of public/available/reliable charging, concerns about repairability (H/K). Look at the battering the Mercedes and Ford EV's are taking on depreciation. As another site mentioned in the last few days, cars aren't supposed to depreciate by 40-50% in a year or 2.
  • Jkross22 Ford already has an affordable EV. 2 year old Mach-E's are extraordinarily affordable.
  • Lou_BC How does the lower case "armada" differ from the upper case "Armada"?
  • TMA1 Question no one asked: "What anonymous blob with ugly wheels will the Chinese market like?"BMW designers: "Here's your new 4-series."see also: Lincoln Nautilus
  • Ivor Honda with Toyota engine and powertrain would be the perfect choice..we need to dump the turbos n cut. 😀
Next