GM Effectively Names Canada Its Global Homeroom for Advanced Vehicle Development

Michael Accardi
by Michael Accardi

General Motors Canada announced today, along with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, that it will bolster engineering and software development efforts in Canada with a 700-job strong hiring initiative.

The work in question will focus on autonomous driving software and controls, connected vehicle tech, active safety and vehicle dynamics technology.

In addition, Mark Reuss, GM’s Executive Vice President of Global Product Development, Purchasing and Supply Chain, announced a new Automotive Software Development Center in Markham, Ontario, as the Oshawa Tech Center is already bursting at the seams.

Today’s announcement shouldn’t be viewed as a General Motors initiative with the support of the Canadian and Ontario governments, but a push by the Liberals to make Canada “the most inviting jurisdiction on the planet for transformative innovation,” starting with General Motors, said Trudeau.

“In choosing Canada to be the home base for its Global Centre for Advanced Vehicle Software development, GM is affirming the skills, the ingenuity and the immense potential of Canada’s workers.”

Canada is a hotbed of tech research and development. Silicon Valley continues to pluck talented people from Ontario, the University of Waterloo is one of the top STEM universities in North America, and Canada has already played host to the incubation of numerous technologies found on the Chevy Bolt.

However, with Oshawa Assembly hanging in limbo and Unifor threatening to strike over a lack of production mandates, the announcement arrives at an interesting time.

Engineers cost good money no matter where you go. Conversely, an army of factory workers do not — and it’s easy to see the manufacturers understand the arithmetic quite well. Eight plants have opened in Mexico over the last eight years while Canada has lost two.

But as Trudeau said in his closing remarks, “today’s announcement is not an endpoint.”

Despite a lack of production mandates beyond 2017, GM Canada won’t abandon manufacturing in Ontario. Based on the language used, it sounds like automotive manufacturing in Ontario will stick around, albeit with a far different face to it.

“It’s absolutely encouraging, this is GM saying that they have a long-term commitment to Canada,” said Jerry Dias, National President of Unifor.

“Obviously our expectation would be that the technology developed is going to be used in their [GM] Canadian manufacturing, which will include and must include Oshawa. I view this [announcement] as an incredible positive.”

On the surface, it seems GM will look to shift its Ontario manufacturing focus towards high dollar, high margin products like connected, autonomous, alternative propulsion cars.

The higher margins and sale prices help mask the higher manufacturing costs, while satisfying the Liberals’ image goals for the Ontario workforce.

“There’s no question that I’m expecting they [GM] have large hopes for their Canadian plants,” Dias continued when asked exactly that.

“I mean, the facilities here in Oshawa do everything right — it has an incredible paint shop, capacity, we win all the quality awards, we’re the most productive plant they have in their chain — so the stars are aligned for us to get a product.”

Manufacturing, which has long been declining in Canada, remains one of Ontario’s key sectors, employing 750,000 workers. It is a sector neither the Federal or Provincial governments are interested in abandoning. However, with pressure from lower cost regions quickly siphoning off capacity, Canada’s auto sector must adapt.

With today’s announcement, GM is effectively choosing Canada to serve as its global homeroom for advanced vehicle development — and that’s a very good thing.

[Image: © 2016 Michael Accardi/GMInsideNews]

Michael Accardi
Michael Accardi

More by Michael Accardi

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 70 comments
  • Gardiner Westbound Gardiner Westbound on Jun 10, 2016

    "Friday’s hiring announcement will have little impact on the company’s manufacturing footprint in Canada, said Mark Reuss, GM’s executive vice-president of global product development, purchasing and supply chain." -Financial Post, 6-10-16

    • See 1 previous
    • JimZ JimZ on Jun 12, 2016

      @DeadWeight I think he's probably next in line for CEO regardless; who knows what Kim Dan-Ak's reasons were for anointing Barra as CEO, it might have been simply that Reuss was not yet seen as "ready." it's like there was talk how Mark Fields was hopeful for the job before Alan Mulally came on board. If you're C-level material, keep on keeping on and you'll get there.

  • Pch101 Pch101 on Jun 12, 2016

    For the love of all things holy, please include "socialism" in the TTAC spam filter. This is allegedly a car blog, but some posters are intent on making it something else.

    • See 5 previous
    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jun 12, 2016

      Pch101, Why do you want a "socialism" filter? Is it because the auto industry is highly unionised? And what political paradigms do unions promote and support? Socialism. It seems the people who believe in socialism are the only ones offended.

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next