FCA Discovers It's Very Difficult to Give Away the Chrysler 200

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The 200 is certainly approaching death’s door more rapidly than first anticipated.

First, there was a temporary plant shutdown as a reaction to an inventory glut. Then, in response to the market’s clarification that, yes, the 200 has truly fallen out of favour, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles instituted layoffs at the Sterling Heights factory where the 200 is built. News that the current Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart would not be followed up by FCA-developed successors was made all the more real when FCA boss Sergio Marchionne said 200 production may be suspended by the end of this year.

From a corporate standpoint, there’s no doubt that FCA’s compact and midsize U.S. market passenger cars are not long for this world. Marchionne even kicked the 200 while it was down by publicly declaring its faults, design errors which play a part in Consumer Reports’ anti-recommendation.

But dealers still have tens of thousands of Chrysler 200s to sell.

FCA’s sales reports make it abundantly clear that it isn’t easy selling a prematurely discontinued car, particularly when the man who is ultimately responsible for bringing the car to fruition called its designers “dummies.”

According to Automotive News, FCA had a 117-day supply of nearly 33,000 Chrysler 200 sedans heading into May. Only 7,600 200s were sold in the United States in May 2016, a 62 percent year-over-year decline equal to 12,407 lost sales.

FCA clearly understands just how undesirable the Chrysler 200 really is at full price — the 200 wouldn’t be in its current position if a midsize Chrysler with a maddening nine-speed automatic transmission and awkward rear seat ingress was deemed by consumers to be desirable at a competitive price point.

That’s why manufacturer discounts on the 200 reached $4,500 last month, dropping the MSRP of a 2016 Chrysler 200 Limited from $25,485 to $20,985, including destination.

But it was under that scenario that 200 sales plunged 62 percent to only 7,600 units and Chrysler’s share of the midsize market tumbled by more than half from 8.5 percent in May 2015 to 3.8 percent in May 2016. Collectively, volume from the Chrysler 200’s midsize car challengers fell 12 percent for a daily selling rate decline of five percent in an abbreviated May. The 200’s daily selling rate slid 59 percent.

Thus, it’s time to forget the manufacturer’s advertised $4,500 discount and ring in the news of Chrysler.com’s new promotion: a $6,500 discount on the 2016 Chrysler 200 Limited. There are restrictions, naturally. The $4,500 discount is merely the 200’s price reduction, the added $2,000 is for buyers of the 200 who are trading in a non-FCA vehicle. FCA’s disclosure states that the offer is limited to 10 percent of eligible vehicles in dealer inventory, and delivery must occur by July 5, 2016.

Regardless, that $25,485 car is now an $18,985 car. Can it get any better for a car 96 percent of midsize car buyers didn’t want last month? Well, yes. Actually, it can.

* Dealer may sell for less.

[Images: FCA]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 108 comments
  • HeyILikemySaturnOK HeyILikemySaturnOK on Jun 06, 2016

    Apparently, dealers aren't feeling too much of the heat around here because I'm not seeing any such discounts for these in my neck of the woods. Online sales prices are roughly $20k - $24k for the 4-cyl, $26k and up for the V6. $2,500 cash back incentives are advertised but that's it. I love the styling of the these cars, and the interiors seem nice, but that's about it. Too many negative reviews for me to seriously consider it as my next car, though.

  • Mike Mike on Jun 06, 2016

    When I got my 2005 Saab 92x Aero, GM was offering more than $9,000 of incentives to clear the lots. The sticker on the tarted up Subaru WRX wagon was almost $33,000. After incentives and some additional whittling, I paid $20,000 for a brand new Saabaru with the performance package. That was a good deal. This is still a Chrysler 200.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next