2016 Infiniti QX50 AWD Review - Athletic Heavy Drinker

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy
Fast Facts

2016 Infiniti QX50

3.7-litre V6 (325 horsepower @ 7,000 rpm, 267 lbs-ft @ 5,200 rpm
Seven-speed automatic transmission with Drive Sport mode, all-wheel drive
17 city / 24 highway / 20 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
15 (Observed, MPG)
Base Price
$35,850 (U.S.) / $37,900 (Canada)
As Tested
$44,495 (U.S) / $50,080 (Canada)
All U.S prices include a $995 destination fee. All Canadian prices include $1,995 freight and PDI fees, and A/C tax when equipped.

From krill-hungry Lincolns to Predator-style Lexus grilles, the automotive market is littered with luxury crossovers like rocks covering the landscape of my home province of Newfoundland. With few exceptions, they’re all ponderous boxes offering the driving dynamics of tapioca pudding. Adding a sport package to these machines simply upgrades them to slightly warmer tapioca pudding.

The 2016 Infiniti QX50, though, surprised me … and I like surprises — for example, buying a new type of beer and finding it to my liking, or having a tool work better than expected. These are all experiences that give me pure joy. Heck, I even bought my first house largely based on the fact its floorplan wasn’t what I expected.

The 3.7-liter V6 engine in the QX50 is the biggest surprise, even though it appears in myriad forms in nearly every vehicle Nissan/Infiniti makes. The VQ V6 delivers 325 horsepower here; not a huge amount of power compared to its competitors, but it sings a song all the way to its near-7,000 rpm redline.

The engine is positioned behind the centre line of the front axle, contributing to the QX50’s positive handling characteristics and pleasant ride. The seven-speed automatic is a welcome relief from droning CVTs, and features a strangely petite shifter that’s perfect for Donald Trump or someone else gifted with small hands

Testing at my home in eastern Canada in April gives me an opportunity to sample the QX50’s all-wheel drive on snow-covered roads. A switch on the centre console, between the knobs for the furnace-quality heated front seats, allows drivers to switch into Snow Mode, thus blunting throttle response and adjusting traction control. Speaking of which …

… Nissan really doesn’t want you to turn off the traction control. The button for doing so is down by the driver’s left ankle, well out of view of any biped with eyes in their head and not their feet. I circled it in the picture above because it truly answers an ergonomic question no driver has asked nor dreamed to ask, even during those drug experimentation years.

Space abounds in the QX50. It’s big enough for this six-foot-six author, even with its sunroof, and provides for a comfortable driving position. Elsewhere, there are odd vertical creases on the passenger side of the dashboard under which the airbag resides, a styling flourish that left many riders puzzled and became the butt of crass remarks comparing it to various parts of the human anatomy. Quality, soft leather covers many touch points, but there are some hard plastic pieces in a few places where none should exist.

Oddly, given the wealth of leg and headroom, the centre console is very cramped and fails to provide any practical real estate in which to lodge a phone being charged by the convenient USB port. Sure, the cupholder is there — notably covered by a nicely actioned, leather-trimmed lid — but I refuse to dump my phone into a well in which spilled remains of yesterday’s coffee may lie. The QX50’s centre console real estate is so tight that two large double-doubles cannot reside side-by-side in the cupholder. At least the covered storage underneath the centre armrest is deep, if narrow.

The infotainment system provoked neither awestruck wonderment nor fits of rage. It was simply … there. Response times were adequate, screen resolution was adequate, and there was an adequate number of redundant buttons. Sensing a pattern here? Adequate.

As a personal preference, I do favour a black interior rather than the tan trappings of our tester, but that’s a very subjective opinion. No matter the colour, the leather smells great. Every vehicle has that new-car smell; the QX50 has the sumptuous, deep aroma of new leather. I tried to no avail to put the smell in a bottle with the intent of selling it at high-end boutiques: Eau d’Nissan.

For 2016, Infiniti stretched the QX50’s wheelbase by 3.2 inches, with all of that newfound space going to the passengers, and most of that to rear seat legroom. It’s certainly noticeable, too. Space for legs is good both front and rear and the 18 cu. ft. of cargo space is well shaped, easy to load, and lit from above by a light on the hatch. Why is this worth mentioning? Way up there on the hatch, the light won’t get covered by items in a fully laden cargo area. The fancy chrome handle on the cargo cover flops around like a freshly caught carp when not secured.

Fuel economy was dismal, with the Infiniti swilling premium fuel at a rate far exceeding its 17.2 miles per gallon city rating. Ignoring the optimistic on-board computer and using technology available to Wyatt Earp, I used a pen and calculated a consumption of approximately 15 mpg. I’m willing to chalk some of that up to a green engine, winter tires, and 100 km of rural driving, but there’s no escaping the 3.7L VQ’s prodigious thirst when hauling around 4029 pounds of all-wheel-drive crossover.

Starting at $35,850, the QX50 AWD makes a good case for itself at that price point. Our tester, continuing the Infiniti tradition of forcing customers to buy certain option packages in order to get other ones, was loaded to the gunwales with $7,650 worth of options and fees to ring the bell at $44,495. At that price, it’s value proposition is murkier.

A $2,000 Premium Plus package mainly serves up a navigation system and Infiniti’s trick Around View Monitor, which allows a top down view of the vehicle during parking manoeuvres. Sadly, tasty saltine crackers are not included in the Premium Plus package. From there, the $2,400 Deluxe Touring package offers 19-inch alloys and HID headlamps that light up the dark side of the moon but have a strange and abrupt low beam cutoff point. The $2,750 Technology package includes lane keeping and other semi-autonomous driving features. It adds up quickly. Our tester had all three packages, with slightly different content and pricing for the Canadian market. I’d leave the trio of option boxes unchecked and drive away for less than 40 grand.

Infiniti has struggled with its identity since its rocks-and-trees advertising campaign that launched the brand in the late ‘80s. Even now, its product offerings range from milquetoast convertibles to brawny body-on-frame SUVs. The QX50 surprised me, pleasantly, and I think the QX50 inhabits the sportier side of the Infiniti showroom, offering an unpretentious alternative to the small crossovers from BMW and Mercedes.

Selling Points: siren of an engine, agreeable interior space, and that leather smells great


Deal Breakers: small centre console, alarming thirst for fuel, option pricing by Prada


The Bottom Line: a crossover for those who want more sport and less utility.

Infiniti Canada provided the test vehicle and insurance for this review.

[Images: © 2016 Matthew Guy/The Truth About Cars]







Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 109 comments
  • 33873 33873 on May 19, 2016

    Looks really dated, almost like a Porche Cayenne knockoff..."Nissan-style" *shudder* interior looks cheap, too

  • Laserwizard Laserwizard on May 19, 2016

    Hideous product that induces projectile vomiting upon seeing it. There is no reason to buy this hideous thing unless you want to prove you are a blind idiot.

    • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on May 20, 2016

      Indeed. True arbiters of taste stick with Fords of the 1997 vintage- a fine, fine year. First year of the ovoid F-150, 2nd year of the ovoid Taurus, etc etc.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next