TTAC News Round-up: Toyota One-Ups Rivals, Robots Invade BMW, and TVR Taps Wales

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Toyotas will soon be screeching to a halt everywhere and that should make its rivals jealous.

That, BMW unleashes the robots on the workers, eccentric automaker picks a place with funny-sounding names, General Motors isn’t falling out of love with China, and Mercedes-Maybach to get a rival … after the break!

My dad’s car can stop sooner than your dad’s car

Stopping is the new going fast, and Toyota wants its cars to do a lot of the former.

The automaker has announced that almost all of its vehicles will adopt automatic emergency braking next year, almost five years ahead of a deadline voluntarily set by a group of automakers last week.

The safety system will be in place in almost all Toyota and Lexus vehicles by the end of 2017, the automaker announced yesterday prior to the New York Auto Show.

“High-level driver assist technologies can do more than help protect people in the event of a crash; they can help prevent some crashes from ever happening in the first place,” stated Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota Motor North America.

“We are proud to help lead this industry in standardizing these systems and bring automated braking to our customers sooner rather than later.”

The day following the braking agreement, Volvo made it known that it has included the system on its vehicles for the past two years. Ouch.

Automatic for the people

BMW expects a fleet of small robots to cut the cost of building a car by five percent.

The automaker has unleashed a swarm of small, trolley-pushing robots into its German logistics facility to speed up the flow of inventory, Bloomberg reports:

The German manufacturer plans to roll out the automated trolleys, which BMW makes in-house, to other warehouses after a six-month trial. The program is part of a broader effort to squeeze out several hundred million euros in costs in the coming years to fund the development of self-driving features and other technologies for its cars, investments that may not pay off for years.

Speeding up the way parts are moved around a production facility was one of the last ways BMW could squeeze efficiencies out of its manufacturing process.

TVR has new digs

Wales, which has a hamlet named Llanfihangel-yng-Ngwynfa, will play host to a new factory for eccentric automaker TVR.

The independent British sports car maker, which keeps its fans continuously guessing about what the future holds, will employ 150 workers in Ebbw Vale to build a new TVR model, reports The Guardian:

The TVR investment is expected to create 150 jobs in an area due to be transformed by the building of the £315m Circuit of Wales project, which includes a racetrack and a motor sports centre of excellence …

The current management team acquired the brand in 2013 and has been looking for a base in which to build a new version of the car.

Orders have been strong for TVR’s newest vehicle, which will begin production next year. Within five years, TVR hopes to be able to produce 2,000 vehicles annually.

GM has high hopes in the Orient

Chinese growth might be slowing, but General Motors is betting that the emerging vehicle market will rebound.

The automaker is sticking with earlier plans to invest in the country and expand its lineup, according to Reuters:

While GM continues to bet on the growth of the Chinese market, consultancy JD Power has said that three or more years of less than 5 percent growth would trigger a painful restructuring in China’s auto sector.

Analysts say China’s auto market has entered a period of unprecedented uncertainty as the economy grows at its slowest pace in 25 years.

“Even though the China market is maturing, it will still be a tremendous source of growth for us in both the short term and the long term,” GM President Dan Ammann told a media conference on Monday.

GM’s plan is to introduce 60 new or refreshed vehicles in the Chinese market in the next five years. A second phase is being added to the company’s Wuhan plant to double capacity.

Conspicuous wealth creeps up in the rearview

The Mercedes-Maybach S600 is the pinnacle of German luxury motoring, but that crown could soon be wrestled away by its chief rival.

BMW has confirmed it will build an ultra-luxury vehicle designed to dethrone Mercedes from its perch at the top end of the market, according to Automotive News:

“Just like certain competitors, we will see that we occupy with credible offers the price bracket of 150,000 euros ($170,000) and beyond,” BMW development chief Klaus Froehlich said last week.

While BMW is attracted by the more lucrative margins that Mercedes earns on the Maybach versus its base S-class sedan, its future car would have to drive like a quintessential BMW.

Froehlich suggests the looming super-sedan won’t be based on an existing vehicle platform, as the Mercedes-Maybach is.

“Some simply do 4 or 5 wheelbases [in length] and add varyingly thick chrome packages,” he said. “That will not be the BMW approach.”

[Image: TVR, kenjonbro/ Flickr ( Flickr)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Zip89123 Zip89123 on Mar 22, 2016

    I'm pretty sure Toyota's dead line will be the chalk marks drawn around your Toyota and body.

  • Noble713 Noble713 on Mar 22, 2016

    TVR's Speed Six (4.0L NA inline-6, 350+hp) is maybe my third-favorite I6 engine. Hopefully during their time off they figured out how to make one that doesn't need a complete overhaul at intervals that would make an coachbuilt Italian supercar look reliable.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next