NHTSA Unveils New Tests, New 5-star Safety Rating System for Cars

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Tuesday announced significant changes to its tests and rating system for every new car in the U.S. Beginning in 2018, new cars will be rated on a five-star system, in half-star increments (for the first time), and will encompass information from new tests — including front overlap crashes already in use by other safety organizations — and pedestrian impact information.

The proposed changes would place an emphasis on active safety features such as blind spot monitoring and crash avoidance systems. The announcement Tuesday followed a statement last month that the agency would recommend automatic emergency braking on new cars beginning in 2018.

“The changes provide more and better information to new-vehicle shoppers that will help accelerate the technology innovations that saves lives,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx.

The proposed changes by NHTSA include a “frontal oblique crash” test similar to tests already used by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The frontal oblique crash would measure the relative safety of a car struck at a 15-degree angle by an object that overlaps 35 percent of the overall car width, on the driver’s side only, according to the proposed rules.

The test mimics the IIHS’s moderate overlap and small overlap crash tests, of which the latter has been particularly onerous for manufacturers to ace.

NHTSA also announced it would test pedestrian safety for new vehicles by measuring head and leg injuries when struck by those vehicles and use new dummies to better measure injuries for drivers and passengers in crashes.

“NHTSA’s 5-Star Safety Ratings program was the first of its kind, and the idea has now spread around the world,” NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind in a statement Tuesday. “Today, we’re adding to that legacy of global safety leadership, ensuring that American consumers have the best possible information about how to protect themselves and their families, and taking a significant step forward in our efforts to save lives and prevent injuries.”


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 17 comments
  • Old_WRX Old_WRX on Dec 10, 2015

    The question is: How much more inattentive will drivers be with all the nannies that make them feel like they don't need to pay attention to avoid an accident? People, at least in this country, seem to have an attitude that they can be as careless as they want and all the safety features on cars and machinery will keep them from getting hurt. Is it just me or do others find this mentality scary?

    • VolandoBajo VolandoBajo on Dec 10, 2015

      It scares the hell out of me to think that the guy in front of me will be texting like hell, not worrying about the car in front of him, because of AEB. Then the car ahead slows down to make a left turn, and his AEB jams hard to avoid an accident. Now I have to worry about not rear ending him because of his abrupt stop. In most states, the car behind will be the legally responsible party, and the AEB will let the careless driver off the hook. Even if I have AEB, there is a good chance an airbag might go off. I agree with the comment that I want a car that keeps me safe if there is an accident, not a car that thinks it can make better situational judgments than I can, no matter how complex the situation. Get the careless drivers off the road. Don't make it easier for them to be more careless, and to inflict more injuries and panic driving changes on other drivers because of their enhanced carelessness, caused and supported by AEB.

  • Tosh Tosh on Dec 13, 2015

    But red turn signals are still OK? Safety my bottom...

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next