Junkyard Find: 1995 Eagle Summit AWD Wagon

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

It’s hard to keep track of all the twists and turns of the drama involving Chrysler, Mitsubishi, and American Motors vehicles and branding during the last quarter of the 20th century — and that’s without even bringing Rootes Group stuff into the cast of characters.

The Eagle Summit Wagon, which was a left-hand-drive Mitsubishi RVR slapped with the badges of a marque named for a long-defunct AMC vehicle and not much related to the Mirage-based Eagle Summit car, is a good example of an obscure Mitsu-Chrysler sold just a few years before a bunch of Daimler DNA got added to the Chrysler genome.

We saw this ’93 Eagle Summit FWD Wagon a couple of years back, and now here’s an AWD example that I spotted in Denver last month.

If there’s a low-American-sales-figure Japanese four- or all-wheel-drive vehicle, you’ll find it in a Colorado wrecking yard — sooner or later.

This one didn’t have particularly high miles on the clock when its career came to an end.

Perhaps it failed to pass Denver County’s not-very-rigorous (compared to California, where I once lived) emissions test.

Sold in Denver (or a Denver suburb), will be crushed in Denver.

Of course, all the different-colored body panels from other badge-engineered RVRs (including the hood from a Plymouth Colt Vista wagon) weren’t doing the resale value of this car any favors, so perhaps the final owner just gave up on it due to lack of sufficient cup holders.

In Europe, the ’95 RVR (badged as a Space Runner) was sold using this “your life is over now that you have children, so who cares what kind of car you drive?” ad campaign.

In Japan, the RVR was ideal for hauling a busted-legged Daffy Duck in the back seat.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Festiboi Festiboi on Dec 18, 2015

    I used to really like these as a kid. Someone in our neighborhood had a white Plymouth Colt Vista, and it looked like a simple, honest-to-goodness little van. Back then I was always into dorky vans, so this was befitting. In college, my first boyfriend had a 1990 Nissan Axxess. That was the same basic principle, being a small minivan. However, the Axxess is even more rare than the Mitsubishi trio (sold only in 1990 in the US), had very Japanese futuristic 80's styling, and unlike the other vsns of the time; had dual sliding doors. Parts were even relatively easy to find, since the mechanicals were shared with the more-common Nissan Stanza I grew to love that van. It was easy to park in the city, fuel efficient, incredibly roomy, great visibility, and was just unique. But it had a tough life. The boyfriend constantly brushed it against a roof pillar in the apartment complex parking lot, the sunroof leaked and the interior eventually smelt like mildew, and the engine mounts were out; at idle the car shaked relentlessly. The mini-minivan idea is a fantastic one that just never caught on here

  • La834 La834 on Jun 10, 2017

    Despite the single sliding door, I see these as an early crossover more than a micro-van. These were poorly marketed and disappeared just as the Toyota RAV4 became available. In addition to the Expo LRV that this Eagle is a clone of, there was also a longer Expo AWD with four hinged doors. Throw bigger tires on either of these and Mitsubishi could have developed the car-based crossover market instead of Toyota.

  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
  • Tane94 A CVT is not the kiss of death but Nissan erred in putting CVTs in vehicles that should have had conventional automatics. Glad to see the Murano is FINALLY being redesigned. Nostalgia is great but please drop the Z car -- its ultra-low sales volume does not merit continued production. Redirect the $$$ into small and midsize CUVs/SUVs.
  • Analoggrotto Another brilliant press release.
Next