Fix Due Friday For Volkswagen's Dirty Diesels

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 30th, 2020 Published: November 20th, 2015

Volkswagen will have to submit Friday its plans to the California Air Resources Board and Environmental Protection Agency to fix hundreds of thousands of illegally polluting cars in the U.S., Reuters reported ( via Automotive News). Although a fix is due today, testing that fix could take months before it would be installed in cars.

The deadline for the automaker comes after it announced it would ask Michael Steiner, head of Porsche development and quality, to oversee Volkswagen’s compliance with officials worldwide to fix up to 11 million cars. In Europe, Volkswagen demonstrated a fix for its 1.6-liter diesel engine that included an air sensor and software update that cost around $10.68, according to German outlet Wirtschaftswoche.

Volkswagen has said that its newer cars would likely only need a software update to be compliant. Older cars that are equipped with EA189 2-liter diesel engines may need more costly fixes.

Volkswagen of America CEO Michael Horn told journalists Wednesday at the Los Angeles Auto Show that the automaker would address U.S. regulators in “days” and the automaker would announce its fix for those cars soon.

“I am personally hopeful we will be able to announce something soon about the remedies,” he said at the auto show.

CARB chairwoman Mary Nichols told German newspaper Handelsblatt that Volkswagen should buy back some of its older cars that would be too costly to repair.

“I think it is quite likely that they will end up buying back at least some portion of the fleet from the current owners,” Nichols told the newspaper, according to Reuters.

It’s likely that the remedies would either be installing a bigger lean nitrogen filter or retrofitting a urea injection system, in addition to software fixes. Either fix could take years to test, according to the Associated Press.

The automaker is preparing for a costly fix — or potential buy back — of its 2-liter cars. Volkswagen said it would cut more than $1 billion in plant investments for 2016 to help pay for the scandal.

Volkswagen CEO Matthias Müller said the company would try to minimize future damage.

“What we definitely won’t do is make cuts at the expense of our future,” Müller said, according to Reuters.

#Audi #CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard #Ea189 #Emissions #EnvironmentalProtectionAgency #Fix #Volkswagen #VwDieselScandal

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 5 comments

Wmba on Nov 20, 2015

From Autocar today: "Volkswagen Group executives in the UK could be imprisoned for up to 10 years for their part in the emissions scandal, secretary of state for transport Patrick McLoughlin has revealed. Responding to enquiries from Louise Ellman MP, who chairs the Commons’ Transport Committee, McLoughlin revealed that the department for transport (DfT) could prosecute VW for providing “materially false” type approval information under the Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2009 - an offence that is liable for an unlimited fine. He added that the Competition and Markets Authority could launch action under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 for unfair commercial practices, leaving VW liable for an unlimited fine or two years’ imprisonment, or both. Finally, he added that the Serious Fraud Office may prosecute VW for making a gain from false representations, an offence under the Fraud Act 2006. This subject to a maximum 10 years’ imprisonment, an unlimited fine, or both." So as the wheels of government grind slowly on, this looks to answer the question whether VW broke the law, at least in Britain. The point still remains whether anyone will actually get off their doofus and prosecute, or just mill around and say they could if they really wanted to.

Like Reply
RHD on Nov 21, 2015

A guy goes in to his local VW dealer and buys a brand new Volkswagen. Then he drives it straight to the junkyard and asks that it be crushed. They check his paperwork, look at him funny but do as he requests. As the heavy slab mashes the car flat, a satisfied smile crosses his face. "That was a brand new Volkswagen, mister! Why did you want to do that?" asks the scrapyard operator. "Oh, I'm just avoiding years of expense and suffering as the middleman!"

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”