Big Three Go Long On SUV, Truck Production in North America

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Detroit automakers may be betting high-profit SUVs and trucks are a better fit for their domestic plants as those automakers shift production away from cars to make room for larger, high-margin vehicles.

Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will largely shift production of their cars to Mexico and bring more trucks and SUVs to North American facilities, according to their contracts with the United Auto Workers, Automotive News reported.

The report consolidates production planning schedules included in UAW contracts with domestic automakers, which shows automakers’ plans to move some of their cars to Mexico or overseas. Of the Big Three, General Motors will sell the most domestically produced cars in North America, including the Malibu, Impala, Sonic, Bolt and Volt, although the small-car plant recently announced a slowing production schedule. Ford will still produce the Mustang and Fusion at its Flat Rock plant in Michigan.

The shift represents a significant departure for the automakers who moved production of cars into the U.S. after 2000 to insulate themselves from massive SUV slowdowns due to rising fuel costs.

According to Ford’s contract with the UAW, production of the slow-selling C-Max hybrid and Focus will head to Mexico in favor of a new truck (likely Ranger) and SUV (likely Bronco) at its Wayne, Michigan facility. Union workers at that plant voted overwhelmingly in favor of the four-year contract with the automaker, in part, because of that plant’s gain of a high-margin truck and SUV.

Ford’s chief U.S. sales analyst Erich Merkle told Automotive News the automaker’s improved SUVs and worldwide sales could offset any sudden rise in gasoline costs in North America, which burned the automakers last time around when they bet heavy on SUV sales.

“The SUV has evolved dramatically over the last 15 years, and that’s really helped to keep it at the forefront,” Merkle told Automotive News. “SUVs are actually a growing segment not just in the U.S. but when you look to Europe and parts of Asia and China. It’s a worldwide growth story.”

The automakers have introduced smaller, more fuel efficient SUVs to offset a possible rise in energy costs and sales of crossovers of all sizes have surged. According to our own Tim Cain, best-selling midsize sedans have slumped by 1 percent so far this year compared to last year. However, best-selling compact crossovers, such as the Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 and Ford Escape, have surged by 13 percent, year-over year. Last year, sales of full-size sedans slumped 8 percent from 2013.

That sales trend has so far been reflected in future production of cars by the Big Three. In its deal with the UAW, Ford signaled that it would likely end production of the Taurus in America and fill that void at its Chicago facility with the Lincoln MKC crossover.

FCA is expected to shift production of its Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart to Mexico and build more Jeep Wranglers and Wrangler-based pickups at its Toledo facility as part of its deal with the UAW. Jeep is likely to build a three-row crossover, likely a Jeep Grand Wagoneer, in the U.S., and last month FCA chief Sergio Marchionne hinted that the company would study a Ram-based, full-size SUV.

According to Automotive News research, the cars that Ford and FCA are moving out of the U.S. — combined with the Buick Verano, which is expected to move to Mexico or China — account for 45 percent of the Big Three’s domestic car production in the U.S. so far this year.

Automakers such as Toyota, Honda, Subaru and Nissan are expected to keep production of many of their cars in North America. Toyota was rumored to move Camry production to Canada after announcing its decision to move Corolla production to Mexico. However, Toyota recently announced it would expand production of RAV4 in Canada, possibly quelling the Camry rumor. Last month, Honda started production of its Civic in Ontario and Indiana and Subaru will build its Impreza at its Indiana plant.

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 28 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Nov 17, 2015

    The Big Three are reliant on the sheltered pickup truck market in the US. So having the US produce the full size pickup in the only real market for them shouldn't surprise many, then add the protection offered. SUVs/CUVs, a similar story, especially the larger ones, except they don't have the same protection. But, is it worth from a logistical perspective to move all of the large SUV part around the globe? The US will keep it's large vehicle production, until the next oil price shock. Then the US will have little. Australia found this out when the consumer became more interested in smaller vehicles and CUVs. Ford and Holden just couldn't compete.

    • See 4 previous
    • RobertRyan RobertRyan on Nov 18, 2015

      @Big Al from OZ The Falcon it was based on WAS the 2nd best selling Vehicle and was making a profit. Territory was OUTSELLING the Japanese SUV's at one point and making a profit. Ford's current imported products , including the locally designed, Ranger can only dream of doing that now. Ford is in big trouble here, but they saw value in the design, development and testing aspect of Ford Australia and have massively expanded those facilities.for developing future Ford Global products

  • Olddavid Olddavid on Nov 17, 2015

    Can anyone explain to me how Germany, with higher labor costs, still produces small cars at a profit? This "we can't do it" mea culpa is bullshit. The UAW is becoming as clueless as its' overseers.

    • See 4 previous
    • RobertRyan RobertRyan on Nov 18, 2015

      @OldDavid The UAW is becoming a hindrance in the US as well. Somehow it bargains for lower wages than what the transplant workers are getting in the Southern US States., bizarre

  • Zerofoo An almost 5000 pound hot hatch that fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down? No thanks.
  • Tassos Jong-iL This would still be a very nice car in North Korea.
  • Jeff One less option will be available for an affordable midsize sedan. Not much can be done about GM discontinuing the Malibu. GM, Ford, and Stellantis have been discontinuing cars for the most part to focus on pickups, crossovers, and suvs. Many buyers that don't want trucks or truck like vehicles have moved onto Japanese and South Korean brands. Meanwhile large pickups and suvs continue to pile up on dealer lots with some dealers still adding market adjustments to the stickers. Even Toyota dealers have growing inventories of Tundras and Tacomas.
  • Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
  • Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
Next