Chevrolet Corvette 427, Z06 Owners File For Class Action Against GM

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

A group of owners of 7-liter V-8 powered, 2006-2014 Chevrolet Corvettes have filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against General Motors claiming those models have excessive valve guide wear that leads to engine failures.

The filing, which was made Wednesday, said General Motors is aware of the problem, but has yet to come up with a solution.

The 19 owners have filed more than 70 claims, “including violations of the RICO Act, unjust enrichment, negligence and fraud,” reported Law360.

GM began testing vehicles using the “wiggle method,” said the owners, and when the test found many of the cars had valve guides out of spec, the automaker dropped the test because it “would lead to more repair and investigations than it wished to perform.”

This isn’t the first time this year the Corvette has been in the spotlight due to engine failures.

In July, Gary Gastelu of Fox News experienced an engine failure in the current-generation Chevrolet Corvette Z06 powered by the new LT4 V-8. Earlier in the year, owners were experiencing engine failures at under 1,000 miles on the clock.

In response, General Motors instructed owners to follow the break-in period and change their oil at or before hitting 500 miles.

“We now encourage all owners to change their oil at 500 miles to remove possible contaminants created during the engine break-in process. And, as always, we encourage the use of Mobil 1 synthetic oil – which is a factory fill for all Z06 models, and Stingray Z51 models – and encourage owners to follow the engine break-in process detailed in the owner’s manual,” said Monte Doran, a spokesman for Chevrolet.

During Motor Trend’s “Best Driver’s Car” test this year, the Corvette Z06 finished dead last — or not, as MT placed it as a DNF — due to performance issues.

“It didn’t work. The damn Z06 retarded spark by 8 degrees, and the 1.7-liter TVS supercharger refused to make boost. No one knows why,” said Motor Trend’s Jonny Lieberman.

General Motors blamed the lack of performance on “bad gas”, but all cars in the test received their fuel from the same source.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 36 comments
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually pretty appealing (apparently I'm doing this now). On a similar note, a friend of mine had a difficult situation with a tenant which led to eviction and apparently the tenant has abandoned a 2007 Jag S-Type with unknown miles in the garage so he called me for an opinion. Before checking I said $2-3 max, low and behold I'm just that good with the 3.0L clocking in at $2,3 on average (oddly the 4.2 V8 version only pulls $2,9ish) and S-Types after MY05 are supposedly decent.
  • DO I have owned a 2012 LR4 since day one and it has been the best vehicle I have ever had the pleasure of having in the garage. I know how easy it is to hate on Land Rover but this LR4 is comfortable, has a ton of storage room and is so versatile. With 110k miles, mine is now relegated to ‘other’ car use but is still the go to for off road adventures and snow runs. Nice to see one featured here - I think they are so underrated.
  • Tane94 I'd be curious to know whether 87 octane is no longer the most popular grade of gasoline by sales volume. My Costco often runs out of Premium grade and I suspect 93 octane might now be the most popular grade of gas. Paying 40-50 cents more per gallon 87 vs 93 octane because of turbo engines is the real story
  • Redapple2 125 large? You re getting into 911 territory.
  • Redapple2 Industry worst quality prevents any serious consideration. I ll take an Evil gm Vampire Denali first.
Next