Designers and Their Cars - Automotive Patent Art Revisited

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

A Brooks Stevens concept.

Aaron Cole’s post about automotive patent art gladdened my heart. Years ago, I decided to check out some of Les Paul and Leo Fender’s original patents on their electric guitars and I discovered the artistry of patent drawings. These days the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as well as patent offices around the world, accept digitally produced artwork. However, before the digital age, an inventor had to hire someone skilled at technical drawing to produce the various exploded and see-through sketches needed to describe the “preferred embodiment” of a process patent.

Of course the “inventor” of a design patent — a slightly different form of intellectual property that protects the design and look of a product — is more often than not, the actual designer.

Following up on Aaron’s post, I decided to put the names of some notable automotive designers into a patent search engine to see what I could find. My hypothesis was that in the case of a design patent, particularly for a car, the artwork for the patent application was likely to have been drawn by the designer. A patent is a big deal to any engineer or designer and he’d likely want to be the one responsible for representing his own idea best.

Clare MacKichan’s Chevy Nomad

Yes, sometimes the boss takes credit for subordinates’ work. Harley Earl, General Motors’ first head of styling, was known not to draw very well. Designers and clay modelers working for him, though, said he had a masterful way of waving his hands that communicated well to the designers the vision he had in his mind’s eye. Car design is a collaborative process, involving people you work with and work for. Guys like Earl, his successor Bill Mitchell, or carrozzeria boss Nuccio Bertone had some justification in putting their names on patents, even if they only had supervisory roles.

Car body designed by Harley Earl in 1921 when he was still working for his father’s custom body shop in Los Angeles, before he was hired by Alfred Sloan to start GM’s styling department in 1927.

Next to lead designer Hank Haga’s name, the Chevrolet Aerovette patent carries Mitchell’s name along with that of senior designer Chuck Jordan (who succeeded Mitchell as head of GM Design) as well as GM designer Jerry Palmer. A similar situation exists with the current Mustang convertible, whose patent bears Ford design chief J Mays’ name along with those of designers Moray S. Callum, Joel Piaskowski, Darrell Behmer, and Kemal Curic.

A Ray Dietrich design.

I’m willing to guess that even if Earl, Mitchell or Mays didn’t render the patent drawings themselves, they assigned a senior designer with the task of their posterity, not some intern. Regardless of who did the actual drawings, they were very well executed.

Enjoy:

Eugene “Bob” Gregorie was Ford’s first head of styling.

One of Virgil Exner Sr’s Chrysler-Ghia show cars.

Harley Earl’s name is on this Cadillac design from the early 1950s.

This Motorama concept, called L’Universelle, was a front wheel drive passenger van designed by Chuck Jordan.

One of Ian Callum’s Jaguars

A more recent, digitally rendered Jaguar

Marcello Gandini’s Lamborghini Diablo

Giorgetto Giugiaro’s DeLorean DMC12, an update of an earlier design of his.

JB’s editors at R&T might think that Paul Bracq designed the BMW M1, but it’s Giugiaro’s name on the design patent. Bracq did the BMW Turbo, on which the M1 was based.

Aerovette.

Art Ross, who headed Cadillac and Oldsmobile’s studios, rendered the Golden Rocket Motorama car

Raymond Loewy coupe concept from the early 1960s.

One of Virgil Exner Sr’s last cars for Chrysler.

A Corvair concept by Larry Shinoda.

One of Bill Mitchell’s Corvette concepts, perhaps the Mako Shark.

Camilo Pardo’s Ford GT

The current Ford Mustang

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can get a parallax view at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS



















Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 27 comments
  • ChiefPontiaxe ChiefPontiaxe on Aug 20, 2015

    Very interesting article. What you should know is that it is highly unlikely that any of the aforementioned auto designers actually penned these patent drawings. Note that the US Patent and Trademark Office has very stringent requirements regarding drawings ( https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/37/1.84 ), and that it's likely that the designer couldn't be bothered to familiarize himself with such requirements and prepare a set of PTO-compliant drawings, in addition to the drawings required by his boss(es). Peace Out, ChiefPontiaxe, registered patent attorney.

    • See 3 previous
    • ChiefPontiaxe ChiefPontiaxe on Aug 21, 2015

      @Ronnie Schreiber Note that the Patent & Trademark Office has loosened the requirements when it comes to design patent drawings - even photos are now acceptable. However, it likely not advisable to submit rendered CAD (or other photo-like) drawings, for reasons noted in my below comment. Namely, when an element is shown in hatched/phantom lines, it means that that element does not form part of the invention, which is why most auto design patents show the wheels in hatched/phantom lines. Otherwise, the patentee would be limited to the vehicle/wheel combination shown in the design patent, and making it easier for an accused infringer to avoid infringement by changing the wheels of the accused vehicle. Thus there is often the need to submit specially-prepared design patent drawings which show ONLY the elements which the applicant claims as the invention. I would be most pleased to help you regarding IP matters, and will email you offline.

  • ChiefPontiaxe ChiefPontiaxe on Aug 20, 2015

    Note that when an element is shown in hatched/phantom lines, it means that that element does not form part of the invention, which is why most auto design patents show the wheels in hatched/phantom lines. Otherwise, the patentee would be limited to the vehicle/wheel combination shown in the design patent, and making it easier for an accused infringer to avoid infringement by changing the wheels of the accused vehicle.

  • Namesakeone It should be a name that evoques the wild west, that emphasizes the go-anywhere nature of how an SUV should be used. Something like a wild animal, maybe something like a horse. I've got it! How about . . . Mustang! Oh, wait. They already did that, didn't they?
  • Slavuta There Used to be Pontiac Trans Sport.... That "Trans Sport" part has a totally new meaning these days
  • 210delray You need to change the headline -- it's a 2025 model.
  • Jeff How about Aspire for a new subcompact crossover from Ford because it aspires to be bigger and its buyers would aspire for a better vehicle if they could afford it.
  • Jeff Carlos Travares wants to cut costs by 1/3. I don't see Chrysler or Dodge surviving too much longer especially since they are being literally starved for product. The success of the new Charger could extend Dodge a few more years but a failure might be a quick end to Dodge. I could see Stellantis moving more manufacturing for Jeep and Ram to Mexico which I believe will eventually be the only surviving brands of the old Chrysler. As for the Durango if it continues it will not be for too many more years it is an outdated product that I doubt will be redesigned especially when Jeep has a comparable product. Stellantis needs to address the high dealer inventory level by giving better incentives and low interest rates to clear excessive inventory.
Next