Chrysler Group Introduces PUG Plan For Pentastar V6 Family
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ Chrysler Group has big plans for its venerable Pentastar engine family, all in the name of improved fuel efficiency and power.
Automotive News reports the Pentastar Upgrade — or PUG — will include turbocharging of current naturally aspirated mills, direct injection and other technologies, with the first updated 3.6-liter V6 to turn up in 2015 under the bonnet of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
The next engine under PUG will be a 3.2-liter V6, which will replace the current 3.6-liter unit powering the Chrysler Town & Country when the next-gen model enters showrooms in 2016. The new engine will be paired with the nine-speed automatic found in some trims of the Jeep Cherokee, and is expected to deliver a 25 percent improvement to fuel economy over the current arrangement’s 17 mpg city, 25 mpg highway EPA rating.
Should all go as planned, the aforementioned 3.6-liter could also help the Ram 1500 take the gasoline-efficiency crown back from the Ford F-150 EcoBoost, which it lost to said truck in November.
I thought Pentastar was intended to support a water-cooled turbocharger from the get-go, they just didn't have the money to productize it from the outset. I may be mistaken about it, howeveer. Good info is difficult to find even on Allpar.
Interesting data point on turbo charged engines vs. variable displacement. Pickup trucks.com tested a bunch of 1/2 ton pickups, including a Ford F-150 with the 3.5 liter ecoboost engine and a Silverado with the 5.3 liter variable displacement, DI V-8. One of the tests was a loop of mixed driving, pulling, IIRC an 8,000 lb. trailer. They swapped drivers at predetermined locations to eliminate the effect of different driving styles, and all of the truck is the test drove together, so they were all subject to the same traffic conditions. The Chevy V-8 achieved about 12 mpg in that circuit; the Ford ecoboost about 10 mpg. That's significant. Unloaded, in EPA's test, the Ford wins by about 1 mpg. So, I think people are deservedly skeptical about the fuel economy benefits of turbocharging small displacement engines.
Every time I hear about the Pentastar, I get into a "what-if" scenario. What if Chrysler retained/refined the LH platform and equipped it with the Pentastar and a six-speed RWD transmission? My day would be made if I could obtain a brand-new Intrepid or Concorde with this combo, running it alongside the LX 300/Charger/Challenger. The MPG would be very impressive with its aerodynamics, even though the platform is relatively large. I'm willing to bet a +5 MPG gain over the LX counterparts with a little tweaking. We'd have a Camry/Accord killer overnight, no hybrid needed. Alas, it is only a dream.
Can't just "blame CAFE" in US. Europe has strict "green laws" and expensive, highly taxed, fuel