By on August 19, 2014

saab-9-3-aero-sedan-my14-09-1

Remember when Saab’s new parent company was close to being taken to court and forced to declare bankruptcy by one of its suppliers? New information may have helped changed course.

Autoblog reports National Electric Vehicle Sweden issued a brief statement proclaiming that while “the company does not have enough liquid cash as today to pay all outstanding debt,” it is “not insolvent” thanks to having assets larger than its obligations.

The statement also states the supplier — Lado Labs — withdrew its petition to force bankruptcy upon NEVS next month due to not having been paid for testing procedures in February. That said, it doesn’t know when it will be able to pay all of its suppliers.

The funding issues came about when one of NEVS’ shareholders failed to deliver its investment to the company, bringing a halt to manufacturing of the 9-3. NEVS is holding ongoing conversations with two unnamed manufacturers with the aim to restart the line once funding is secured.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

4 Comments on “NEVS “Not Insolvent,” Will Pay When Possible...”


  • avatar
    Pig_Iron

    Good luck SAAB. My hope of ever having a new SAAB combi-coupe fades with each passing day. I hope SAAB lives on, at least as an engineering services firm.

  • avatar
    seth1065

    They will not die, the saab zombie lives at least a little longer.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    1. So they have some car-making equipment whose value is higher than their outstanding bills.

    2. Yet, they haven’t produced and sold enough cars to generate cash to pay the bills.

    3. The production line is stopped; therefore, the cash flow is stopped.

    Seems like only another gift will get all these parts moving again. Where are the Saab faithful – couldn’t they raise $22k to solve this? Didn’t think so.

    The “we’re not insolvent; we just can’t pay our bills” claim may be a legal technicality, but the movie will end the same way.

  • avatar
    seanx37

    This may sound dumb, but what does GM have to say about all of this? The 9-3 is just a Malibu. All the parts have to be coming from GM. They were ok about selling parts and technology to a rather sketchy company?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • FreedMike: Well, damn! Glad you didn’t get seriously hurt. Who teaches how to deal with a car that’s out...
  • spookiness: I admit this and Corolla Cross are on my shopping list too, as well as CX-30. Expect all to have hybrid...
  • jmo2: Counting down to the TTAC post about Tesla’s latest earnings: Revenue up 98%, Net Income up 998%, net profit...
  • dr_outback: I feel the same way when reviewing stupid screw ups with girls I dated so I never do it again. It’s a...
  • Lou_BC: I have a tendency to side with SPPPP on this one. I sort of disagree on the transmission though. I had a...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber