Junkyard Find: 1988 Chevrolet Sprint Electric Sport

by Murilee Martin

April 7th, 2014 11:26 PM

junkyard find 1988 chevrolet sprint electric sport

Now that it’s possible to buy electric cars that actually do what cars are supposed to do, we mustn’t forget the very lengthy era— say 1970 to just a few years ago— during which all manner of optimistic-yet-doomed companies converted various econoboxes into lead-acid-battery-based EVs. Every once in a while, I’ll spot the remains of such an EV at a junkyard; we saw a junked EVolve Electrics 1995 Geo Metro EV conversion last year, and now a different Denver yard has given us this ’88 Sprint “Electric Sport.”

The Sprint aka Cultus wasn’t a bad choice for an electric vehicle, being lightweight and cheap.

Electric motors are worth money, either as working motors or as sources of valuable scrap copper, so the one in this car is long gone.

The remnants of the battery tray may be seen in the rear cargo area.

Someone grabbed the no-doubt-modified instrument cluster, too.

Bonus points to anyone who can track down the company that built the Electric Sport Sprint!

#1980s #1988 #1988ChevroletSprint #1988SuzukiSwift #AlternativeFuel #AlternativeFuels #ChevroletSprint #Denver #DownOnTheJunkyard #ElectricCar #Suzuki #ElectricCars #SuzukiSwift #Junkyard #EVs #JunkyardFind #Sprint

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 15 comments

Kinsha on Apr 10, 2014

Looks like your long gone instrument cluster near the battery tray.

Like Reply
Otmar Ebenhoech on Nov 07, 2022

Surprising to see my old Electric Sprint here, a bit worse for wear.
I converted it for a man in the San Juan Islands in 1991, and later got it for my own daily driver. Underpowered at about 25 HP and only a 45 mile range with 12 Optima YellowTop lead acid batteries, but it sure was efficient and fun to drive!
The Brusa AC drive was smooth, no shifting required and the trans was locked in 2nd gear, plenty of torque off the line. Charging to full probably took about 5 hours from empty.
I think it was the kicking "Wayland" stereo that really put it over the top with two 8" microsubs.
I sold it in 2003.
Good times!

1 Reply

Recent Comments

Max So GM will be making TESLAS in the future. YEA They really shouldn’t be taking cues from Elon musk. Tesla is just about to be over.
Malcolm It's not that commenters attack Tesla, musk has brought it on the company. The delivery of the first semi was half loaded in 70 degree weather hauling potato chips for frito lay. No company underutilizes their loads like this. Musk shouted at the world "look at us". Freightliners e-cascads has been delivering loads for 6-8 months before Tesla delivered one semi. What commenters are asking "What's the actual usable range when in say Leadville when its blowing snow and -20F outside with a full trailer?
Funky D I despise Google for a whole host of reasons. So why on earth would I willing spend a large amount of $ on a car that will force Google spyware on me.The only connectivity to the world I will put up with is through my phone, which at least gives me the option of turning it off or disconnecting it from the car should I choose to.No CarPlay, no sale.
William I think it's important to understand the factors that made GM as big as it once was and would like to be today. Let's roll back to 1965, or even before that. GM was the biggest of the Big Three. It's main competition was Ford and Chrysler, as well as it's own 5 brands competing with themselves. The import competition was all but non existent. Volkswagen was the most popular imported cars at the time. So GM had its successful 5 brands, and very little competition compared to today's market. GM was big, huge in fact. It was diversified into many other lines of business, from trains to information data processing (EDS). Again GM was huge. But being huge didn't make it better. There are many examples of GM not building the best cars they could, it's no surprise that they were building cars to maximize their profits, not to be the best built cars on the road, the closest brand to achieve that status was Cadillac. Anyone who owned a Cadillac knew it could have been a much higher level of quality than it was. It had a higher level of engineering and design features compared to it's competition. But as my Godfather used to say "how good is good?" Being as good as your competitors, isn't being as good as you could be. So, today GM does not hold 50% of the automotive market as it once did, and because of a multitude of reasons it never will again. No matter how much it improves it's quality, market value and dealer network, based on competition alone it can't have a 50% market share again. It has only 3 of its original 5 brands, and there are too many strong competitors taking pieces of the market share. So that says it's playing in a different game, therfore there's a whole new normal to use as a baseline than before. GM has to continue downsizing to fit into today's market. It can still be big, but in a different game and scale. The new normal will never be the same scale it once was as compared to the now "worlds" automotive industry. Just like how the US railroad industry had to reinvent its self to meet the changing transportation industry, and IBM has had to reinvent its self to play in the ever changing Information Technology industry it finds it's self in. IBM was once the industry leader, now it has to scale it's self down to remain in the industry it created. GM is in the same place that the railroads, IBM and other big companies like AT&T and Standard Oil have found themselves in. It seems like being the industry leader is always followed by having to reinvent it's self to just remain viable. It's part of the business cycle. GM, it's time you accept your fate, not dead, but not huge either.
Tassos The Euro spec Taurus is the US spec Ford FUSION.Very few buyers care to see it here. FOrd has stopped making the Fusion long agoWake us when you have some interesting news to report.