For decades, big corporate profits were blasted as a sign of greed, especially by unions. GM changed all that. When a sheep dipped GM, free of legacy finance costs, and not paying taxes due to losses a normal company would not have been able to carry over after a bankruptcy, declared a record $7.6 billion profit in 2011, chests of GM boosters swelled with pride, as if the profits had been theirs. A year later, there is $2.7 billion less to be proud of. GM’s European millstone, Opel, continues to drag the company down. Opel’s operative losses more than doubled to $1.8 billion for all of 2012.
GM reported as $4.9 billion profit for 2012, and “a weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter profit on Thursday, citing wider losses in Europe and lower vehicle prices in its core North American market,” says Reuters. Analysts had hoped GM would do better.
The situation in Europe is expected to be getting worse. CFO Dan Ammann told Reuters that “GM still sees industry sales in Europe declining in 2013 and is “not betting on” a pickup later in the year.”
GM wrote down $5.2 billion worth of assets in Europe. GM’s $423 million investment for a 7 percent stake in Peugeot, is now carried at half price on GM’s books. Ammann said that GM has “no intention of putting more cash into Peugeot.”
That is such a strange photo, accompanying this article. Thank you.
Nice pic, but who is that a statue of?
Looks like Adam Opel.
Looks like he could use a wash-n-wax.
$2.7B drop in profit. $900M increase in European losses, plus $1.7B (negative) difference from asset disposals. If you remove asset disposal profits/losses, the 2001 profit was $6.4B, and the 2012 profit $5.4B.
Basically outside Europe GM’s operating results are effectively identical to those in 2011. Not outstanding, but no cause for panic, either.
Not sure what you mean by a “normal” company but GM is not alone in it’s carry-forward tax loss circumstance. Any company, normal or not, that took TARP bucks is eligible.
Isn’t this poor 2012 financial performance a pervasive issue for all auto manufacturer’s European sales, not just GM?
Are not G.M.’s “profits” on the backs of the American and Canadian taxpayers and the companies like Ford that managed their companies properly?
I thought their profits were derived from selling cars to customers.
Losses would be on the backs of tax payers.
If they had paid their bills by selling more cars they wouldn’t have gone bankrupt, and had to be nationalized by the state. Obviously, they weren’t selling enough cars and their losses are on our backs.Bailing out poorly run companies is no recipe for success.
After BK = Three straight years of profit
Before BK = Nine straight years of losses
Bailing out companies DOES = Success
There better be special items included in Opel’s $1.8B loss, one billion more than 2011. If not, I am really starting to wonder if it is worth keeping Opel around. I know GME cut 2600 jobs in 2012 and the Opel Mokka and Adam are runaway hits. GM is looking at a $7B annual net income if all Opel does is break even.
Positives: Automotive free cash flow was $4.3 billion in 2012 compared to $3B in 2011.Total cash on hand is up to $37.2 billion.
Profits increased in all regions except Europe. GM South America has swung to a profit.
I would think GME’s losses include substantial severance/termination costs — but it’s impossible (at least for me) to tell from the information GM has released so far.
There are lies, damned lies, and creative accounting. GM has pulled assets out of Opel it wants to keep, and now Opel has increased losses and poor future business prospects. The German core of Opel is being set up for bankruptcy proceedings.
Our government is not good at this stuff:
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130214/OPINION03/302140335/Another-dud-federal-battery-program?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE