Junkyard Find: 1951 Nash Airflyte

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Why does a car need wheel openings in the front fenders, anyway? The Nash Airflyte, aka the “Bathtub Nash,” proved that long, low, and wide (and a postwar American car-buying public starved for anything with four wheels and an engine) would move the iron off the showroom floor in the late 1940s and early 1950s. I’ve been thinking about building an Airflyte-based project car lately, so I returned to the Brain-Melting Colorado Junkyard to do some window shopping.

It turned out that the yard’s owner wants to keep this ’51 for himself, so I had to content myself with shooting photos instead of wheeling and dealing for a purchase. Fortunately, I’d brought the DSLR and a 25mm lens instead of my usual battered point-and-shoot, so these shots are a little sharper than what you’ll get in most Junkyard Finds.

The days of the flathead six as the standard powerplant for full-sized American cars were coming to an end by 1951, with just about all the Detroit major players working on (or, in the case of Cadillac and Oldsmobile, delivering) overhead-valve V8s.

Through the dust, you can just make out the gorgeous font used for the speedometer numbers.

AM radios were ungodly expensive options in this era, and you had to wait quite a while for the tubes to warm up before you could listen to Ike Turner singing the first-ever rock-and-roll song.

I’m a little disappointed that this car is unavailable, but I’ve got about a thousand more to choose from in this yard.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Allan850glt Allan850glt on Mar 14, 2014

    These early fifties Nashes look pretty sedate when compared to, say the final years, '56-'57 when they opened up the front wheel wells and gave them some real V-8 power! I myself prefer the final years but these earlier models, albeit somewhat unconventional, were pretty cleanly designed cars. I have to wonder how high you had to get that sucker up in the air to change a tire?? Scary! Your jack fails or something goes awry and unless you've got some reallllly quick reflexes, you're gonna lose a limb! I don't get how one would consider a Hudson a step-down in comparison though. Especially considering the eventual H-N merger to AMC and they eventually became "Hashes"..

  • Dneely Dneely on May 14, 2014

    My Dad bought two Statesmen in1951. He and my mother went from Seattle to Kenosh and bought two of them. THey towed one back to Seattle behind the other. Fearing the Korean War would result in difficulty finding parts he put one on blocks in Seattle. We finally put it to use in about 1962 or 1963. Over the years we collecte another 2 for parts and I think nostalgia. I still have 3 of them. Two have been garaged since about 1966. THese were the straight 6 with a 3 on the tree and an overdrive. We made several trips using the folding seats as beds. I have many stories. My dad was so happy when we bought a house on a hill so he could use the hill to start it. THe heater had no fan so you had to be moving to get heat and the wipers were vacuum powered so going over the mountains was a series of speed and back off the gas so the wipers would operate. In about 1965 we towed a 1926 Model T on the back of a 1927 Model T truck from Dallas Tx. over the mountains to Seattle. That trip permenantly printed the smell of brakes into my brain. We were quite a site. Kinf of like the Clampets moving to Beverly hills. Is there a way to put photos on this forum site?

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next