Preview: Fourth Generation Land Rover

Faisal Ali Khan
by Faisal Ali Khan

Land Rover has not given the Range Rover any significant update in ten years. This will change when the next generation is launched later this year. The current generation Range Rover (codenamed L322) is in its third generation. The current Range Rover was developed during the BMW regime (BMW owned Land Rover between 1995 to 2001.) The next generation Range Rover has been codenamed L405 and is based on an all new D4u platform, developed during Tata’s ownership. This exclusive preview is based on information received from JLR executives.

Land Rover’s D4u platform will be used in at least 6 other vehicles from the Land Rover stable. The D4u platform has many benefits, the biggest being its weight. The D4u platform uses high tensile steel and a high quantity of aluminum. The monocoque platform is 25 mm longer than the current Range Rover and offers significant weight advantages. The 2013 Range Rover will weigh at least 500 kgs less than the outgoing model, which tips the scale at 2500 kgs. The wheelbase is bigger too. The D4u platform enables Land Rover to push the wheels to the extremities of the vehicle, resulting in significant increase in interior room.

Land Rover has been involved in many controversies lately, with environmentalist protesting against the gas guzzling tendencies of its SUVs. Tata Motors wants to address this issue. The next generation Range Rover is not only lighter (thanks to the new D4u platform) but also features more fuel efficient engines. The engines on offer will include an updated 4.4-litre V8 diesel, 5.0-litre V8 gasoline (including a supercharged version of this motor) and a V6 gasoline. Land Rover is also working on a V6 diesel engine for the Range Rover, which will give it stellar economy. A hybrid is also on the cards for a early 2014 launch.

The general shape of the fourth generation Range Rover will remain the same as the current model. Tata does not want to mess with the trademark look. The 2013 Range Rover will be slightly wider and longer with the head and tail lights getting influenced by the Evoque. The renderings made by MotorBeam rendering specialist Zaid Muhammed truthfully reflect what we had seen during our interview. The interiors will remain more or less the same with slight changes/tweaks being made to the dashboard. The design of the exteriors has been frozen as we speak, the interior is yet to be finalized. A long wheel base version of the Range Rover is being worked on for the Chinese market (just like the XJ is offered in XJL trim).

The next generation Range Rover will feature active pedestrian safety. In case of a collision, the hood will pop up taking the impact thus reducing injuries to the pedestrians.

Faisal Ali Khan is the owner/operator of MotorBeam.com, a website covering the auto industry of India.

Faisal Ali Khan
Faisal Ali Khan

More by Faisal Ali Khan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Naterator Naterator on Apr 15, 2012

    This should give sales a shot in the arm. I'd expect that they've been slumping. After all, who wants to drop six figures on a model that looks the same as a ten-year old one you can find in a local BHPH lot?

  • Stuki Stuki on Apr 16, 2012

    Perhaps I'm taking faith in the "eat your own dogfood" mantra too far; but offroad/shittyroad vehicle design decisions ultimately made by denizens of the the world's most Uber British upper class, stuck driving on some of the shittiest roads on the planet, ought to make for a better Range Rover. The current one's most obvious shortcoming of road (except for it's inability to actually make it far enough from the repair shop to ever see any off road action), is it's enormous rear overhang, and subsequent 60s Cadillac departure angle. Going the Wrangler Limited route, and lengthening the wheelbase, should go some ways towards alleviating that. Nothing more embarrassing than running over a cow, and then having your Range Rover's rear bumper hung up on the carcass as you're trying to make a quick getaway and all......

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next