Alfa Romeo 4C Can Conquer Our Shores Any Time

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

OK, so so we weren’t immediately thrilled at the prospect of Alfa coming to the US as the sick man of Europe. But with news that Alfa’s 4C, a Dallara-developed, 1,800 lb mid-engined coupe could become the flagship for the brand’s return to the US, we’re starting to warm up to the Alfisti bandwagon. But, there’s a catch (of course): at the suggested €45k price point and 15k-25k unit production plan, this aluminum-and-carbon vision of Elise-meets-8C loveliness won’t be doing much to solve Alfa’s financial difficulties. Still, that’s the Alfa we want to come to the US: the extravagant, over-the-top, money-losing Alfa, not the cynical Fiat-rebadge Alfa. This 4C is a good start down the financially-draining but emotionally-rewarding road Alfa should never have been forced to abandon.




Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 01, 2011

    Well, if you're trying to reintroduce a storied brand to a potentially lucrative market what do you do? 1. introduce an expensive, top-of-the-line halo model that reminds people of that storied history first, or 2. begin with a watered-down volume oriented model at a lower price? Keeping aside the merits of the particular car chosen, it looks like Sergio is choosing number 1. I think he's making the right choice.

    • Craig Fowler Craig Fowler on Mar 02, 2011

      If Lotus has decided to stop making "real" Lotuses, how do you revive Alfa's sports car heritage? Make a Exige replacement.

  • Kristjan Ambroz Kristjan Ambroz on Mar 02, 2011

    It's based on the Dallara produced KTM X-Bow, so a MR layout. Where the X-Bow offers no weather protection (no real windscreen and no option of a roof, even), they seem to have gone for a closed version. If they build it like this, I am sure it will do wonders for the brand - at least for enthusiasts - but as said, the impact on the bottom line will be a drop in the ocean. Oh well, at least there is practically no development needed anymore, given it's out of the box nature.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next