Will Fiat-Chrysler Become An American Firm?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

CEO Sergio Marchionne certainly suggested as much in a speech at the NADA convention over the weekend, in which he said

Who knows? In the next two or three years, we could be looking at one entity. It could be based here

From the perspective of the American taxpayer, this would certainly be the favorable outcome. After all, Fiat didn’t put a single Euro into the restructured Chrysler, and national bailouts don’t usually result in the expatriation of the bailed-out firm. But the US Treasury department isn’t the only master Fiat has to serve, and Marchionne’s suggestion that the Fiat-Chrysler alliance has touched off something of a “firestorm.” The Financial Times reports that

Pierluigi Bersani, leader of the [Italian] opposition Democratic party, demanding an explanation from Mr Marchionne said it was unacceptable for “Turin and the country to become a suburb of Detroit”.

Industry Minister Paolo Romani adds [via the Montreal Gazette]

The head of the carmaker must remain in Turin

And with Italian backlash against a possible Detroit headquartering of the Fiat-Chrysler alliance building, Marchionne is backpedaling furiously.


Italy, after all, has a much stronger traition of government involvement in industry. Most of Italy’s largest multinationals are at least partly owned by the government, as indeed Fiat once was. Fiat-Chrysler’s response: to tell Italian politicians that the Alliance is actually looking at

regional headquarters in Turin, Detroit, Brazil and possibly Asia.

And that approach seems to have softened at least some of the opposition in Italy, as Labor Minister Maurizio Sacconi tells the WSJ

If there is a merger between Fiat and Chrysler, I think the group will inevitably have one headquarters in the U.S. and one in Ital. What matters insofar as Fiat’s roots in this country, is that it carries out its planned investments, because these represent choices that can’t be reversed for a long time

Practically speaking, Chrysler’s stakeholders have some time to hash all of these disputes out: Marchionne says a full alliance could be several years away. Still, as Fiat and Chrysler move closer together, Marchionne will have his hands full trying to balance the competing interests of his government partners and national constituents. After all, as much as Americans want to see Chrysler become part of a US-based alliance, Italians have only one national mass-market automaker… and they won’t be happy if Fiat is no longer an explicitly Italian automaker. We’ll be watching closely as Sergio Marchionne takes on those concerns when he addresses the Italian parliament on the 15th of this month.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Philosophil Philosophil on Feb 07, 2011

    Sorry, I'd like to write something but I can't stop laughing at the picture....

    • See 1 previous
    • Thebeelzebubtrigger Thebeelzebubtrigger on Feb 07, 2011

      Someone's having a blast with photoshop. Pretty funny results, too.:) As to the question of Fiat-Chrysler becoming an "American company", hey why not? Aren't at least half the "American" companies functioning today actually foreign investment vehicles that work by taking US assets out of the US?

  • Mr Carpenter Mr Carpenter on Feb 07, 2011

    Setting up a conglomerate Corporation based in Nevada would not necessarily be a stupid idea, given the low taxation there. The "HQ" could be there (with a few lawyers and accountants), while the "North American Engineering and Automotive Management Group" could be in Auburn Hills, Michigan, and the "European Engineering and Automotive Management Group" could be in Turin. The Automotive Admin HQ (ie the real HQ) could be in WINDSOR, ONTARIO... which would make it possible for Marchionne to live there w/o any hassles from Uncle Sugar.

  • Dlc65688410 300SL Gullwing
  • EBFlex Still a garbage, high strung V6 for an engine and not a proper V8, ugly af, and a horrible interior. What were they thinking? This will not help it's lackluster sales.
  • TheEndlessEnigma Some of the PHEV's out there boast CHADEMO connectors, chargers accepting that connection method are almost nonexistent in North America. That has more than a little to do with the issue. That and PHEV's as a whole are offered on only very limited models, not necessarily desirable models either.
  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
Next