Fiat Chrysler Posts Slightly Smaller Loss; North America Profitable

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles revealed a second-quarter loss of $1.24 billion on Friday, down slightly from the $1.8 billion net loss posted for Q1.

As before, the pandemic weighed heavily on the automaker’s finances, though this spring’s two-month shutdown of domestic manufacturing and the revenue drop arising from the virus didn’t spell red ink for its all-important North American region.

Overall, net revenues tumbled 56 percent, year over year, in the second quarter. Adjusted earnings before interest and taxes stood at negative $1.1 billion, which is half of the $2.2 billion loss predicted by a smattering of analysts polled by Reuters. The automaker’s recovery began in earnest in June. FCA said.

“Our second quarter showed that decisive actions and extraordinary contributions from our workforce enabled FCA to contain the impact of the COVID-19 crisis,” said CEO Mike Manley in a statement. “While the company remains vigilant about the health and safety of employees, our plants are up and running, dealers are selling in showrooms and online, and we have the flexibility and financial strength to push ahead with our plans.”

In the automaker’s North American bread basket, second-quarter adjusted pre-tax earnings were in the positive, at $46 million. Net revenue fell 53 percent due to lower sales volumes, though actual shipments were off 62 percent.

FCA said the ongoing pandemic makes it even more eager to leap into bed with France’s Groupe PSA.

“The COVID-19 crisis has further underlined the compelling logic of the Groupe PSA and FCA merger. Work by both teams towards the completion of the merger has continued apace and we expect to meet the objective of combining as a single company by the end of the first quarter of 2021,” the automaker stated.

“Antitrust approvals have already been granted by twelve of twenty-two jurisdictions. The review initiated by the European Commission is not expected to delay the merger timetable.”

You’ll recall that July delivered news of a new name for the combined companies: Stellantis.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 7 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jul 31, 2020

    My next truck might be a Ram. (Can't believe I'm typing this.)

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Aug 01, 2020

    If the North American market is profitable, you can imagine the margins on Jeeps and Rams (formerly Dodge).

  • FreedMike Meanwhile...Tesla's market share and YTD sales continue to decline, in an EV market that just set yet another quarterly sales record. Earth to Musk: stop with the political blather, stop with the pie-in-the-sky product promises, and start figuring out how to do a better job growing your business with good solid product that people want. Instead of a $30,000 self driving taxi that depends on all kinds of tech that isn't anywhere near ready for prime time, how about a $30,000 basic EV that depends on tech you already perfected? That will build your business; showing up at Trump rallies won't.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Here in Washington state they want to pass a law dictating what tires you can buy or not." Uh, waht?
  • Tassos NEVER. All season tires are perfectly adequate here in the Snowbelt MI. EVEN if none of my cars have FWD or AWD or 4WD but the most challenging of all, RWD, as all REAL cars should.
  • Gray Here in Washington state they want to pass a law dictating what tires you can buy or not. They want to push economy tires in a northern state full of rain and snow. Everything in my driveway wears all terrains. I'm not giving that up for an up to 3 percent difference.
  • 1995 SC I remember when Elon could do no wrong. Then we learned his politics and he can now do no right. And we is SpaceX always left out of his list of companies?
Next