What's Wrong With This Picture: The Korean Cannibals Edition

whats wrong with this picture the korean cannibals edition

This is the Hyundai ix20, a a European-style subcompact MPV in the style of Honda’s Fit. Or, more precisely, in the style of Kia’s Venga. In fact, the similarities between the new Hyundai and its Kia-branded predecessor are strong enough to hint at a future of GM-style brand differentiation issues for the Korean concern. And here’s the real irony: both cars share a platform with the Kia Soul, an American-style B-Segment MPV (possibly the only car to fit that description). Couldn’t Kia have rocked the Soul and left the ix20/Venga segment to Hyundai? Or was the Venga simply too good-looking to die? Either way, these two taught twins are a bit close for comfort.

Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Bd2 Bd2 on Sep 14, 2010

    It's interesting to note that Hyundai and Kia are differentiating their product significantly more so in the US than in Europe. There is basically no sheetmetal shared btwn the Sonata and the new Optima, the Forte and the upcoming Elantra (don't even share the same suspension set-up), the K7/Cadenza and the upcoming Azera, etc., however, for a no. of their offerings in Europe, such as the ix20/Venga and the i30/Cee'd, it's basically the same sheetmetal w/ diff. front and rear fascias.

  • Charly Charly on Sep 14, 2010

    Part of Hyundai/Kia problem is that their market share in the Korean market which necessitates selling the same vehicle under different brands. Also Kia/Hyundai are much more bottomfeeders than in the USA and they are also smaller so they simply need the extra number of cars to make it profitable

  • Inside Looking Out Why EBFlex dominates this EV discussion? Just because he is a Ford expert?
  • Marky S. Very nice article and photos. I am a HUGE Edsel fan. I have always been fascinated with the "Charlie Brown of Cars." Allow me to make a minor correction to add here: the Pacer line was the second-from-bottom rung Edsel, not the entry-level trim. That would be the Edsel Ranger for 1958. It had the widest array of body styles. The Ranger 2-door sedan (with a "B-pillar", not a pillarless hardtop), was priced at $2,484. So, the Ranger and Pacer both used the smaller Ford body. The next two upscale Edsel's were based on the Mercury body, are were: Corsair, and, top-line Citation. Although the 1959 style is my fav. I would love a '58 Edsel Pacer 4-door hardtop sedan!
  • Lou_BC Stupid to kill the 6ft box in the crewcab. That's the most common Canyon/Colorado trim I see. That kills the utility of a small truck. The extended cab was a poor seller so that makes sense. GM should have kept the diesel. It's a decent engine that mates well with the 6 speed. Fuel economy is impressive.
  • Lou_BC High end EV's are selling well. Car companies are taking advantage of that fact. I see quite a few $100k pickups in my travels so why is that ok but $100k EV's are bad? The cynical side of me sees car companies tack on 8k premiums to EV's around the time we see governments up EV credits. Coincidence? No fooking way.
  • EBFlex "I'd add to that right now, demand is higher than supply, so basic business rules say to raise the price."Demand is very low. Supply is even lower. Saying that demand is outstripping supply without providing context is dishonest at best.