Double Blunder: UK Cities Propose Blanket 20 MPH Limit; ABGreen Calls It A Fuel Saver
It’s getting late in the game today and we’re down a couple of points, so its time to go for a double. Thanks to an easy pitch from the UK government and AutoBlogGreen, I’m going to swing. The Nanny State Incarnate is encouraging local UK governments to introduce blanket 20 mph speed limits in all residential area. And ABG picks up the story from Autocar and adds its own little brilliant addition to the story: its going to save fuel. Now how is it that a writer for the biggest little green blog in the land doesn’t know that cars are way less efficient at 20 mph than at their peak efficient speed of somewhere between 35 and 50? And there’s more; in fact this might well be a triple:
It’s not that 20 mph limits didn’t already exist in some cities, but they had to include calming devices like speed humps and chicanes. This proposal by the UK government would free cities to impose the limits city-wide, as was done in a recent trial in Portsmouth. Road safety minister Paul Clark explains:
We have seen that 20mph zones with traffic calming measures can make a real difference to the safety of local roads,” he said. “But we’ve also looked at the latest research and listened to councils and residents who want to introduce 20mph limits on a series of roads where physical traffic calming measures aren’t possible or practical.
“Allowing councils to put in place 20mph speed limits on more streets without speed humps or chicanes will mean that they can introduce them at a lower cost and with less inconvenience to local residents.”
AutoBlogGreen adds its insightful editorial perspective: “Besides saving a few gallons of fuel, these limits are being touted as a safety measure that can also encourage cycling and walking.”
Ok, I’ve passed second, and I’m going for third:
The government is also proposing that average speed cameras be used in residential areas to enforce the limits.
There it is! ABG, it’s not about saving fuel, but about making more money for the government coffers. Silly you.
Did I make it to third safe, or was that stretching it?
More by Paul Niedermeyer
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Oberkanone BMW, Ford, Honda, and Volkswagen have different fleet emissions rules than Stellantis and other manufacturers. This is unfair trade practice and California is the leader of this criminal conspiracy. Unified emissions regulations are needed. Disjointed patchwork of CARB and Federal emissions states results in harm to our economy inefficient manufacturing. CARB emissions regulations violate the Commerce Clause by engaging in extraterritorial regulation.
- 28-Cars-Later Ha, about 60% of the original price... I think these were going out for around $14s in stripper edition with row your own (I believe this was still the first gen made in Japan as well). If I'm right about JDM assembly, this will sell itself soon.
- MaintenanceCosts 2035 is TWELVE YEARS from now. They could buy new diesel buses today and get a full service life out of them before the mandate comes into effect. And if the technology still isn't good enough in 2035, the most rural districts will get a waiver. Nobody is trying to ban rural high schools from their volleyball games.
- Kwik_Shift One day I'll bring myself around to trying one of these out, with manual transmission. They look fun.
- Zipper69 It worked in London, because the center of that city is a medieval layout ON TOP of a Roman layout, both designed for horse drawn traffic.Manhattan's grid and the available public transport options are a different matter.