Autobloggreen Hearts 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL320 BlueTec. Again. Still.

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Yesterday, we took Autobloggreen (ABG) to task for running a thinly-veiled pimpatorial for the new Mercedes-Benz GL320 BlueTec. Their post was disguised as a celebrity trend piece, supposedly informing eco-readers that Hollywood eco-warriors were exchanging their Priora for an equally PC Mercedes-Benz GL320 BlueTec diesel. We so busted them, from the manufacturer’s plates on the carefully-posed cheesecake shot’s whip, to the fact that ABG printed the entire MB press release verbatim. And now, surprise! They’re reviewing the Mercedes-Benz GL320 BlueTec. And do they like it? What do you think? But there is humor here, to be sure. “The garish graphics on the GM hybrid SUVs scream out to the world, ‘look I bought a hybrid! even though I’m still driving alone in an a 6,000 lb, seven passenger SUV!’ The Mercedes, on the other hand, only has discreet BlueTec badges on the front fenders and the tailgate. Aside from that and the GL320 badge, there is no other indication that this vehicle can get mileage in the mid-20s.” Whoa! Mid-20s? In an SUV? ABG’s planet saving mission is go! With 11k worth of options, no less…

“Part of the nearly $11,000 in options on this particular GL320 was the adaptive damping system. Unlike some systems, switching from normal to comfort or sport modes actually made a noticeable difference,” Sam Abuelsamid reports. “While the comfort was perhaps a bit wallowy feeling on some undulating surfaces, it was definitely helpful when dropping my son at school.”

It’s nice to see that Autoblog’s house style– counteract any criticism with an immediate compliment– has made it to their sister site. Anyway, as Lord Humongous said, “no more games!” Let’s get down to the serious bsuiness of justifying driving this behemoth instead of something with serious mpg.

“If you actually find yourself with a need to carry up to six other people with you and tow nearly four tons, and you have a budget commensurate with this level of luxury, the GL320 may be your best option. It offers fuel consumption that’s equal to or better than anything with its capabilities. The GL is not inexpensive with an as-tested price tag of $69,815 including delivery. Even at that elevated price point, it’s still nearly $4,500 less than the base price of the all-wheel-drive Escalade hybrid. Plus you won’t have to pester the dealer to remove those silly stickers.”

True. But even so, I call sell-out.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Brock_Landers Brock_Landers on Dec 10, 2008

    Due to the huge leaps in gasoline direct injection technology, turbocharged gdi engines are already getting pretty much the same mpg numbers to similary sized tdi engines. Only with lower co2 numbers, wider/more usable powerband and similar low-end torque characteristics. Lots of examples 335i vs 335d, VAG 2.0TFSI vs 2.0TDI etc. Diesel hype and stories about diesel market share growth in the US is thing of the past.

  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Dec 10, 2008

    The technology to make these pass US emissions is stunningly complex and will be stunningly expensive to maintain (IMHO) in the long run. In other news, gas hit the 1.30s here today.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next