Why Mazda Wants A Chinese Divorce From Ford

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Everybody is denying that Mazda’s Chinese joint venture with Ford is quickly coming to an end. The Nikkei is unfazed by the chorus of contradiction. Today’s edition of the Japanese paper sheds more light on the impending divorce in China: Mazda wants “to give itself more latitude to navigate the growing market as it sees fit.” That’s putting it mildly.

In 2003, Mazda had entered a joint venture with China’s FAW. The successful cooperation is on-going. Three years later, Mazda was asked by Ford to join Ford’s joint production venture with Chang’an. Mazda had to split its Chinese operations into two, dividing its attention in the market. Ask the folks at Volkswagen how much fun it is to deal with two joint venture partners in China. Mazda had it even worse. The three-way Ford/Mazda/Chang’an tie-up “often had difficulty agreeing on production plans,” said a Mazda executive to The Nikkei, and he most likely was polite.

Says the Nikkei: “Against this backdrop, Mazda reviewed its China tie-up with Ford, leading to the termination decision.”

China is not only the world’s largest auto market, with around 13.64 million new cars sold. It also has turned into Mazda’s most profitable market. Ending the cumbersome three-way joint venture will give Mazda necessary breathing space, and the ability to implement decisions quickly. For instance, the only car Mazda makes at the joint-venture Nanjing factory is its Demio subcompact, a model that makes Chinese consumers yawn. With the joint venture ending, Mazda could shift the Axela production from a joint-venture plant in Chongqing to Nanjing, boosting capacity utilization.

What Mazda needs are strong partners in strong markets. The Nikkei sees Mazda getting closer with Toyota (Mazda has decided to procure a hybrid system from Toyota.) As for markets, The Nikkei opines: “Seeing that Mazda’s only emerging-market plants are in China and Thailand, it may be wise to explore linking up with a partner in other such countries, where auto demand is growing more rapidly than in developed markets.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Imag Imag on Jan 19, 2010

    I've said this before, but in my opinion, anything that makes Mazda more profitable is good for all of us. No other car company supports enthusiast-level racing so thoroughly or puts out vehicles so oriented to enthusiast values at a reasonable cost. So my best wishes go to Mazda in China. Hopefully it gets them the cash to finish the 16X...

  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Jan 19, 2010

    What a classy little chassis! The cars nice too, the "clown face" is starting to grow on me.

    • Mpresley Mpresley on Jan 19, 2010

      Take a stiff drink, a couple of aspirins, then go to bed early and in the morning you'll feel much better and be thinking straighter. And for god's sake, stop eating at Ronald McDonalds. The Chinese buffet is OK, though.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next