Volt Birth Watch 140: Aesthetic Holdups

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Freeps Mark Phelan has a new paean to the Chevy Volt mule’s electric grunt, saying the Cruze bodied tech-tester has “immediate torque for acceleration most sporty small cars would envy.” As GM prepares to build the first run of Volt-bodied test mules starting in mid-June, it’s bumping up the media presence of its last best hope by offering flacks like Phelan another test drive. And this time around the Volt’s “sporty acceleration” tops the talking points. “The test vehicle ran with smooth, quiet power,” reports Phelan, “but driving it felt reassuringly like getting behind the wheel of any new car.” Which conveniently is “a key goal for the Volt program,” according to GM EV Maestro Frank Weber. Another “key goal?” Making it look good enough to draw interest at its $35K price point.

GM-volt.com‘s Lyle Dennis wonders “why GM still needs more time to bring the Volt to market.” After all, they’ve been working on it for what, two years now? It’s just an expensive Chevy with an unproven power system. What’s the big holdup? Looks, apparently.

“Most of it truly is the aesthetic side of it,” Volt Chief Engineer Andrew Farah tells Dennis. “The mule cars aren’t pretty. We know that people want a vehicle that is distinctive.”

In other words, not the Chevy Cruze. That thing is fugly. Or, “not distinctive,” anyway. Do I smell a marketing tagline in the making? Introducing Chevy Cruze: Not Distinctive. At all. Please spend twice as much on the Volt.

And the Volt was distinctive at one point. But then GM took its model to the wind tunnel and found that it was more aerodynamic going backwards than forwards. Since its Prian makeover last fall, we’ve known essentially what the Volt would look like, and distinctive it ain’t. But, according to Farah, the aesthetic features “only comes together in the final stages.”

Building a car “is a lot like fashion,” says Farah. “If you start too soon you’re selling something that’s already old.”

So why have we already seen two different Volts being pimped in GM ads for years now? Is the Volt going to receive another refresh before it heads into production? Farah isn’t forthcoming with the details, but if this line of questioning misses the point as far he’s concerned.

The real upshot? “The things that are holding it up are really the typical new vehicle kinds of things.” As in not the electric underpinnings, which have so far “proven very robust and successful.” How robust? “Nothing has come up that we haven’t had an answer for,” he tells Dennis. There have been no “unanticipated problems.” How reassuring.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • KixStart KixStart on May 19, 2009

    From the article: "He concluded therefore “the things that are holding it up are really the typical new vehicle kinds of things,” and not in fact the high tech cutting edge battery and powertrain engineering which have so far proven very robust and successful." I find this really hard to believe. If it's the typical new vehicle things... GM's done those many times before and this project is supposed to have their best people. Why would there be anything holding it up at all? The answer should be more like "On schedule." The more credible source for delays is in the weird parts. It's possible that this article, filtered through the hyperenthusiasm of Lyle Dennis, is much ado about nothing at all... that awkwardly phrased questions from Dennis meet slightly tormented or misunderstood answers from Farah and confusion results. Maybe the thing really is 100% on schedule. Frequent GM-Volt and you find confusion often reigns there, anyway; GM's answers are often confusing, anyway (their execs should keep their mouths shut, instead of showing off how much they "know" about this top project), and the visitors to the site tend to make elaborate castles in the air of the merest wisps of rumor... I think Dennis does it, too. But on the face of it, this doesn't quite ring true. Time will tell.

  • Trouble codes guy Trouble codes guy on May 21, 2009

    Gosh, GM is all talk, talk, talk, blah, blah, blah. They can't walk the walk and produce the Volt. What's with all the hype on a car that might never hit the showrooms (well the ones that are left by the time the Volt comes out)? Wake me up when I can go test drive one at the local dealer. GM, you're a big part of the reason the EV1 was crushed. I haven't forgot that, that's why I bought a Prius a year ago. I love it and can't wait for a plug-in Prius so I can support a company who is actually walking the walk when it comes to producing an "electric" car that's really a hybrid car. Fuck you GM.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next