The Brave New World of Rising Commodity Prices

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

Scrap metal. The phrase may not mean much to you, a pistonhead who takes pride in his ride. But scrap is one of the most lucrative industries in the car business today. That old junk car in the neighbor's yard that would have been lucky to get $50 seven years ago is now going for over $200– on the steel content alone. When you throw in the recyclable platinum, aluminum, copper and lead into the mix, the revenue on an average junker is anywhere from $350 to $600 per vehicle. This inflation has implications for both the average Joe and the entire American automobile industry.

The environmental benefits of this market for dead cars are obvious. Vehicles that were once put out to pasture– with toxic fluids spilling into the soil and the surrounding landscape– are now, thankfully, a rarity. Companies are draining, crushing and recycling aluminum and copper radiators. Old batteries now go for $15 in many areas of the country. Even the rims that were once left on the beasts of old are being recycled and re-used by everyone from GM to the People’s Republic of China.

In short, simple economics has motivated both mature and developing automotive markets to do what environmentalists have been calling for over many decades: clean-up the remnants of our past consumption.

The other far smaller benefit to recycling is local, or, to put it another way, industry-specific. The American scrap dealer buying all that leftover refuse is making some serious cashola. China has a nearly insatiable appetite for industrial junk, and they are far from alone in that demand. Japan's scrap iron and steel prices rose to $460 per ton this week. This competition for any old iron is putting some immediate money back into the hands of the recyclers. These local business’ neighborhood communities are enjoying the benefits of record prices for copper and steel. Many recylcing companies are investing in new technology.

Unfortunately, the seller’s market for scrap pretty much leaves everyone else in the proverbial lurch. Despite the current downturn in automotive sales, worldwide demand for car-building commodities has not, and can not, be satisfied by recycling. Commodity prices are still soaring. And that means that today's automakers have to juggle three not-so-pleasant options: raise product prices, find new ways to reduce their costs (usually through “design improvements”) or simply accept a lower level of profit. Others in the automotive food chain are even less lucky.

For low-income consumers, the high prices for raw automotive materials trigger far worse consequences. For starters, rising raw materials prices have forced some parts makers to the wall; they can’t simply pass on their costs to the manufacturers. (This is what precipitated GM's and Chrysler's recent attempts to sue and seize the assets of many of these faltering firms.) We’re already hearing reports of replacement part shortages due to the American Axle strike. The harder it is to get low-cost replacement parts for your car, the less it’s worth.

Meanwhile, long term, rising commodity prices hit manufacturers hard. How do you justify selling cars whose loss levels are getting worse by the day? This is not an easy question to answer. You can only sell your products at a loss for so long. Whether or not you believe any of the domestic carmakers are on the brink of disaster, the lack of affordable raw materials certainly helps speed these embattled automakers towards bankruptcy.

Needless to say, that possibility would whack American consumers but good. A bankrupt automotive company has virtually no responsibility to anyone. You want the warranty honored? Too bad. You want parts now? Hold on a sec/minute/month/eternity. While it is certainly true that a bankrupt automaker would continue to do business, the chain of customer responsibility (such as it is) would be severely damaged. And the customer would literally pay the price.

If you think that I'm being alarmist, keep in mind that I've literally seen thousands of Daewoos stuck at auctions– for years on end– because the courts had to decide their rightful owner. Even today, few cars in the market are worth less in their market segment than a Daewoo. All things being equal, there are few events that can hurt a car owner more than bankruptcy (hence Detroit’s unwillingness to consider the nuclear option).

So we’re living in a new world, where old cars are less of a blight on the landscape but car owners and car makers face significant new risks. It’s no wonder Toyota’s heading to Africa for new sources of exotic metals and a GM exec was convicted of commodity related fraud (that cost GM some $80m). In this business, it's no longer the one who owns the gold that rules. It's the one who owns the steel, copper, lead, petrochemicals and lithium.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Landcrusher Landcrusher on Mar 31, 2008

    SL, You make great points. IIRC, Toyota did a major study on the Dodge Neon and made all sorts of decisions based on that to LOWER the quality of many of their parts. That is about the time you say they were decontenting. Apparently, they had been over building a lot of parts, like their gas tank coatings that were likely to fail twenty or thirty years after the car was crushed. Unfortunately for them, and their buyers, this is almost the same road I think our Domestics went down decades ago. Eventually the mind set poisons the process and the pendulum swings too far towards "cheap crap". If it is not fixed immediately, they will be right where our guys are in a decade or two.

  • Capdeblu Capdeblu on Apr 05, 2008

    Has anyone seen the documentary "A Crude Awakening"? (available at Netflix) Its about whether the world may or may not be running out of oil. Even if we aren't running out the world (China and India) is using more which is going to mean price increases. This cannot be good news for the American car industries as they offer so few fuel efficient cars.

  • ToolGuy Good for them.
  • ToolGuy "I'm an excellent driver."
  • Tassos If a friend who does not care about cars asks me what to buy, I tell her (it usually is a she) to get a Toyota or a Lexus. If she likes more sporty cars, a Honda or a MiataIf a friend is a car nut, they usually know what they want and need no help. But if they still ask me, I tell them to get a Merc or AMG, a 911, even an M3 if they can fix it themselves. If they are billionaires, and I Do have a couple of these, a Ferrari or an even more impractical Lambo.
  • ToolGuy Good for them, good for me.
  • Tassos While I have been a very satisfied Accord Coupe and CIvic Hatch (both 5-speed) owner for decades (1994-2017 and 1991-2016 respectively), Honda has made a ton of errors later.Its EVs are GM clones. That alone is sufficient for them to sink like a stone. They will bleed billions, and will take them from the billions they make of the Civic, Accord, CRV and Pilot.Its other EVs will be overpriced as most Hondas, and few will buy them. I'd put my money on TOyota and his Hybrid and Plug-in strategy, until breaktrhus significantly improve EVs price and ease of use, so that anybody can have an EV as one's sole car.
Next