[Editor's note: the following block-quoted passages were sent to us by an enterprising anonymous tipster (italicized passages were quoted in the original from linked sources). I've decided to let the argument speak for itself, and simply interject a few thoughts (non-block-quoted) towards the end.]
On their Q2 earnings call, GM gave this presentation [PDF] and made the following claims:
“On Slide 12, we provide what we view as key performance indicators for GM North America. The 2 lines on the top of the slide represents GM’s U.S. total and retail share. The bars on the slide represent GM’s average U.S. retail incentives on a per unit basis. Now U.S. retail incentives as a percentage of average transaction price and compared to the industry average is noted at the bottom of the slide.
“For the second quarter of 2011, our U.S. retail share was 17.6%, up 1.3 percentage points versus the prior year and down 0.6 percentage points versus the prior quarter due to the absence of the first quarter sales programs. Our incentive levels on an absolute basis have declined significantly from the prior year as well as sequentially. On a percentage of ATP basis, our incentives were 8.9%, down 2 percentage points versus the prior year. This puts us at approximately 103% of industry average levels for the second quarter of 2011, flat versus the prior year.
“In terms of incentive levels, our plan continues for us to be at approximately the industry average for the year on a percentage of ATP basis. These results for share and incentive demonstrate the impact of our plan to produce great vehicles the customers are willing to pay for.”
I did not try to verify the first part of the highlighted claim (that incentives have declined compared to previous year totals), but the second part of the claim (that incentives have declined sequentially) is demonstrably false.


Recent Comments
Summicron - Poor people in America tend to be fat…really fat…for men, 300+lbs fat. This car is clearly intended for them and their families who are...
probert - It’s certainly different in that it can be refilled in about 9 minutes.
probert - Honda i’s been running a fleet in California for years – I’d be curious as to how they’ve resolved issues...
Summicron - Wiki say: “The English name Tucson derives from the Spanish name of the city, Tucsón [tukˈson], which was borrowed from the...
Summicron - BTW, anybody know what that blue area is on the car in the pic? It looks wrinkled on the rocker panels (still called that?) so maybe...
binkje - According to Di’s sources, Saab has postponed their tax payments over several years and the suspicion is...
AMC_CJ - A tad less then 23k for the Mustang (before taxes and all of that great stuff). The Fiesta I saw on the lot, but had been sold,...
CJinSD - You’re right CelticPete. Car and Driver tested a 3 cylinder 1.0 liter Ecoboost Focus. It was pathetically slower(2.7...
niky - Whereas the modern equivalent (in terms of size and specs), the Mitsubishi Mirage, gets 40… combined. Of course, having driven both, the Mirage is nowhere...
CJinSD - I’m seeing a pattern where you involve yourself in discussions to counter act correct conclusions, Power 6. I’d love to know what...