Some Bronco Owners Say Trail Turn Assist Killed Their Axles

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Trail Turn Assist is a cool Ford Bronco feature that brakes the inside rear wheel to tighten the turning radius and help the SUV navigate challenging off-road obstacles. Though helpful, some owners have reported that the feature could damage the vehicle.


At least two owners have taken to the Bronco6G.com forum in recent months to talk about Trail Turn Assist’s impact on their Bronco’s axles, claiming that the feature causes too much stress on the axle and related components. Some forum users responded with stories of others having the problem, stating that the solution is to weld around the broken attachment points, a fix that is neither practical nor acceptable for a new vehicle.


Some stated that their dealer refused to fix the component under warranty, with one saying the shop said the Bronco had aftermarket mods. Ford’s warranty language states that using the SUV in a manner described in the owner’s manual does not void the warranty, but it’s hard to know what happened before and after using Trail Turn Assist. The automaker also said that the feature is for use on loose or slippery surfaces and that using it on hard roads could increase tire wear and cause damage.


These sorts of issues are always tricky to sort out. On the one hand, it’s easy to jump on Ford for denying what seems like a straightforward warranty issue, but we have no idea how the SUVs were being used when they broke. If there were modifications, the warranty could have been voided before the owner used Trail Turn, but again, it’s almost impossible to accurately cast judgment without having been there.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Redapple2 Redapple2 on May 17, 2023

    I ll say this. American Axle or a Dana on my truck? I going dana all day - any day.

  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on May 17, 2023

    I question some of these electronic features that, while easily enabled, can be very hard on the driveline. In addition to trail-turn, how about that line-lock feature on the 5.0 Mustangs? Or the "No-Lift" feature allowing you to keep the accelerator pinned while slamming through the gears. Or "launch mode" which optimizes revs while you dump the clutch and mat the gas pedal? Will be interesting to see how the manufacturers handle the inevitable claims from these otherwise cool features.

    • CoastieLenn CoastieLenn on May 22, 2023

      The thing with these features (largely) is that the ECM/TCM/BCM have counters for each of those modules. The dealership can easily tell if the car has either a) been launched 432 times in a single driving cycle [abuse] or b) has had the stored data cleared right before bringing the car in for repair [willful intent?]. Not to say that it will make it easier for the dealer to deny warranty claims, but it gives them ammo to use against the owner if they can prove neglect.


  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys so many people here fellating musks fat sack, or hodling the baggies for TSLA. which are you?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Canadians are able to win?
  • Doc423 More over-priced, unreliable garbage from Mini Cooper/BMW.
  • Tsarcasm Chevron Techron and Lubri-Moly Jectron are the only ones that have a lot of Polyether Amine (PEA) in them.
  • Tassos OK Corey. I went and saw the photos again. Besides the fins, one thing I did not like on one of the models (I bet it was the 59) was the windshield, which looked bent (although I would bet its designer thought it was so cool at the time). Besides the too loud fins. The 58 was better.
Next