Skip the TruCoat: Top 3 Dealer Add-Ons to Avoid as Per Consumer Reports

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Anyone who has ever bought a new or used car from a dealership knows the minefield of add-ons customers must generally navigate before signing on the line which is dotted. Just this week, my own parents were presented with a deal sheet that showed an admin fee ($799), tire warranty ($499), and undercoating ($999) on a second-hand Lincoln from a non-Lincoln store. They walked.


Consumer Reports has recently published a list of dealership extras they recommend binning when buying your next car.


Atop their list is, perhaps unsurprisingly, VIN etching. Some will try to say this process of engraving a car’s VIN onto its windows provides protection against theft – or more ways to ID yer car if it does get ripped off – but those of us around here know better. If someone wants your wheels, they’re taking them regardless of any hastily carried out etching. There will be sales reps who will frown when rebuked, perhaps saying the service is required by law or is part of the price since it’s already on the car and can’t be removed. When confronted with the latter objection a few years ago, this author simply replied “Change the windows, then.” We bought a car elsewhere.


Rustproofing and its ilk also get low marks from CR – but perhaps for different reasons than window etching. In some areas of the country, different forms of rustproofing can indeed make a difference in the long-term health of a car’s metal. Where the service can fall down at the dealer level is in its price; better deals are often available right from the source. The less said about so-called interior protection and Scotchgarding, however, the better.


Tire products also take a drubbing in the report. The pitch of nitrogen filling is rightly skewered, as are various and sundry wheel & tire warranties which are sometimes not worth the paper on which they are printed. Yes, there are exceptions – we’re sure your Uncle Walt got a free set of Michelins thanks to the warranty he purchased in 1978 – but there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that even paying the pro-rated price on warrantied rubber can be more expensive than finding a new set on sale.


What are your recommendations? Do you have any no-go items when shopping new or used at a dealer? And, for consistency's sake, an article like this is required by TTAC law to include a TruCoat clip from YouTube.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2LLB9CGfLs


[Image: Jon Rehg/Shutterstock.com]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
  • Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
  • Calrson Fan We are already seeing multiple manufacturers steering away from EVs to Hybrids & PHEVs. Suspect the market will follow. Battery tech isn't anywhere close to where it needs to be for EV's to replace ICE's. Neither is the electrical grid or charging infrastructure. PHEV's still have the drawback that if you can't charge at home your not a potential customer. I've heard stories of people with Volts that never charge them but that's a unique kind of stupidity. If you can't or don't want to charge your PHEV then just get a hybrid.
  • AZFelix The last time I missed the Malibu was when one swerved into my lane and I had to brake hard to avoid a collision. 1 out of 5⭐️. Do not recommend.
  • 2ACL I won't miss it; it was decent at launch, but in addition to the bad packaging, GM did little to keep it relevant in the segment. I'd prefer that another domestic automaker doesn't just give up on the mainstream sedan, but unlike some of Ford's swan songs, the Malibu made an indifferent case for why they should live.
Next