These Vehicles Just Lost Their Top Safety Pick Rating

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has updated its crash testing processes and hardware in recent years to account for new safety technologies, as well as the fact that people can walk in and buy new EVs that can weigh as much as two or three comparable gas vehicles combined. The most significant update for 2023 relates to the IIHS’ side crash test, but there are several other changes that have drastically reduced the number of vehicles that qualify for a Top Safety Pick award. 


Side crash testing now involves 82 percent more energy, and vehicles have to earn an “Acceptable” or “Good” rating to earn a Top Safety Pick. Getting the Plus designation requires “Good” scores. The IIHS also updated requirements for crash prevention systems and headlights. 


The result of these changes is that far fewer vehicles qualify for either award. There were 101 winners in 2022, with 65 of them grabbing a Top Safety Pick +. This year, the IIHS only awarded 48 vehicles with a Top Safety Pick award, and only 28 got the Plus. The vehicles that were dropped aren’t automatically less safe, but it is surprising to see such a drastic reduction in the number of vehicles that qualified. 


Some of the cars that earned an award in 2022 but fell off for 2023 include:


·      Hyundai Elantra

·      Subaru Crosstrek

·      Volkswagen Golf GTI and Golf R

·      Nissan Maxima

·      Kia K5

·      Lexus IS

·      Mercedes-Benz C-Class


Though it just updated its testing methodology, the IIHS said more changes are coming in 2024. Where the new side crash test currently requires an “Acceptable” or “Good” score to earn a Top Safety Pick, both awards will require a “Good” score starting next year. The recently-updated moderate overlap front test will require a “Good” or “Acceptable” rating for a Top Safety Pick +. 


[Image: IIHS screenshot via YouTube]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 21 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Mar 06, 2023

    IHS is a smarmy organization that arbitrarily changes things which make vehicles look bad when nothing has changed. Perhaps these clowns should only test newly changed vehicles instead of devaluing already acceptable product iterations with their arbitrary and capricious standards.

    • See 1 previous
    • CoastieLenn CoastieLenn on Mar 06, 2023

      I understand some of the changes. Curb weights of vehicles are seemingly increasing every year with the invocation of new drivetrain technology. It only makes sense to ensure that the criteria that is being used to evaluate new vehicles is relative and updated with new vehicle properties. There'd be no sense in testing new vehicles against standards from 30 years ago where half of the vehicles on the road weighed under 3000lbs on average.


  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Mar 06, 2023

    The lead photo is basically clickbait - seeing that, I was ready to bemoan Volvo's decline in safety (thinking they had fallen off), especially since they made their reputation on safety. But no, no Volvos on the naughty list.


  • Corey Lewis It's not competitive against others in the class, as my review discussed. https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/cars/chevrolet/rental-review-the-2023-chevrolet-malibu-last-domestic-midsize-standing-44502760
  • Turbo Is Black Magic My wife had one of these back in 06, did a ton of work to it… supercharger, full exhaust, full suspension.. it was a blast to drive even though it was still hilariously slow. Great for drive in nights, open the hatch fold the seats flat and just relax.Also this thing is a great example of how far we have come in crash safety even since just 2005… go look at these old crash tests now and I cringe at what a modern electric tank would do to this thing.
  • MaintenanceCosts Whenever the topic of the xB comes up…Me: "The style is fun. The combination of the box shape and the aggressive detailing is very JDM."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're smaller than a Corolla outside and have the space of a RAV4 inside."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're kind of fun to drive with a stick."Wife: "Those are ghetto."It's one of a few cars (including its fellow box, the Ford Flex) on which we will just never see eye to eye.
  • Oberkanone The alternative is a more expensive SUV. Yes, it will be missed.
  • Ajla I did like this one.
Next