2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross SEL 1.5T S-AWC Review - In a Word: Weird

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 1.5T SEL S-AWC Fast Facts

1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (152 hp @ 5,500 rpm, 184 lb-ft @ 2,000-3,500 rpm)
Continuously-variable automatic transmission with 8 "steps", all-wheel drive
25 city / 26 highway / 25 combined (EPA Estimated Rating, MPG)
9.6 city, 8.9 highway, 9.3 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$28,595 (U.S) / $36,298 (Canada)
As Tested
$32,125 (U.S.) / $38,598 (Canada)
Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $2,000 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

Mitsubishi burned a lot of what little street cred it had left by taking the name of a once-beloved affordable sports coupe and plunking it onto yet another crossover.

The good news, if there is any, is that the crossover that now bears the nameplate is more than a little quirky.

The bad news – it’s not an affordable, fun-to-drive sports coupe.

Not to mention that the brand may soon be history, at least on these shores.

The least weird thing about the Eclipse Cross is that the driving experience is mostly unremarkable, especially in urban environs. It’s neither fast nor slow, but the 1.5-liter turbo four-cylinder has enough guts for undramatic commuting. The steering feels relatively connected to the road, with appropriate weighting, and the ride is about par for a vehicle in this class. The continuously-variable automatic, which has “steps” meant to mimic a conventional automatic, is relatively inoffensive, as CVTs go.

[Get a price quote for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross here!]

If it were safe to close your eyes while driving, you might think you were wheeling any old crossover. The driving experience is mostly normal, although the mode selector for all-wheel drive is a rarity.

It’s the rest that’s weird.

Let’s start with the styling. While not all that weird up front, it quickly gets quirky. The front view is pretty standard for a crossover – boxy and angular hood area with large fog lamp openings and a big lower fascia below the grille. Not quite attractive, but not ugly, either.

From the side, the view looks sloped and stanced, an appropriate attempt by the brand to give some sport to a crossover bearing a hallowed nameplate. Out back, though, it goes off the rails.

The rear haunches are unnecessarily bulbous, even accounting for the fact that the wheels are placed near the edges. The light bar bisects the rear glass, the taillights spike out, and a curving spoiler awkwardly frames it all.

Inside, the story isn’t much better. Fonts used in the gauge cluster and infotainment system are outdated, and the infotainment screen looks like a TomTom that got stuck to the dash. A Lexus-like touchpad sits aft and starboard of the gear shift, and there’s a reason only Lexus and Mitsu use these things. The buttons are laid out logically enough, but look weird – as if the design team thought they’d need to try extra hard to overcome Mitsubishi’s bad reputation of late. Material quality and build quality was better than what I’ve encountered on every Outlander I’ve ever driven, although the bar here is set low.

The entire experience just screams out that you either don’t know/care about cars and took the best deal you could find, or you have just enough money for a crossover in this class but not enough to drop a few grand more on something better.

Of course, Mitsubishi would argue that the Eclipse Cross offers value for the money, and the features list does bolster the brand’s case, even if Mitsubishi lists some features that are so mundane they’d might not make the sticker on other vehicles.

Standard items on my SEL test unit included fog lamps, LED lighting front and rear, paddle shifters, chrome grille accents, 18-inch wheels, heated front seats, leather seats, tilt/telescope steering wheel, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, satellite radio, Bluetooth, multiple USB ports, multiple-view camera, head-up display, keyless entry and starting, dual-zone climate control, blind-spot warning with lane-change assist, rear cross-traffic alert, automatic high beams, forward-collision mitigation with pedestrian detection, and lane-departure warning.

Options included a package that added a sunroof, premium audio, forward-collision mitigation with high-speed braking capability with pedestrian detection, adaptive cruise control, heated steering wheel, heated rear seats, auto-dimming rear-view mirror with HomeLink, and roof rails. A tonneau cover and carpeted floor mats rounded out the list.

So yeah, the features list is class-competitive. And the $32K sticker price isn’t terrible. There’s value here, perhaps. The Eclipse Cross at least has that going for it, which is nice.

Quirky, odd design is one thing – some people prefer that. And while the materials don’t feel class-competitive, necessarily, they’re still an improvement over what’s offered in other models in the lineup.

Yet, the Eclipse Cross just doesn’t quite feel good enough to justify a purchase to save dollars, unless one has no choice.

Mitsubishi had the chance to make something interesting here and got part of the way there. That’s no way to honor the Eclipse name.

But it is consistent with the band’s recent M.O.

There may be a time when Mitsubishi once again builds interesting cars at a value price. If that time doesn’t come soon, the brand won’t be in this market much longer.

[Images © 2020 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Jun 29, 2020

    The rear styling, the tacked on screen and "stepped" CVT are all individual deal breakers for me. I don't get why you would use a stepped algorithm on a CVT. Just let it do its thing for economy like it is supposed to do. Otherwise drop a proper auto in and be done with it. No mention if it has engine noise piped in. That would be a complete list, though that isn't as bad as the other three and could probably live with it.

  • Akear Akear on Jul 08, 2020

    It is one of the most interesting looking SUV's on the market. I do like Mitsubishi new grill theme. It even looks good on the mirage.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X The dominoes start to fall...
  • IBx1 Get the standard established, then stop building the chargers while you let others license the design from you to build more stations with your standard disgusting
  • IBx1 “Dare to live more”-company that went from making the Countach and Diablo to an Audi crossover with an Audi engine and only pathetic automatic garabge ”live mas”-taco bell
  • Pianoboy57 Not buying one of these new when I was a young guy was a big regret. I hated the job I had then so didn't want to commit to payments. I did own a '74 Corona SR later for a short time.
  • FreedMike This wasn’t unpredictable. Despite what the eV HaTerZ kLuBB would like you to believe, EV sales are still going up, just not as quickly as they had been, but Tesla’s market share is down dramatically. That’s the result of what I’ve been saying for a long time: that the competition would eventually start catching up, and that’s exactly what’s happening. How did this happen? It boils down to this: we’re not back in 2019 anymore. Back then, if you wanted an EV that wasn’t a dorky looking ecomobile like a Leaf or Bolt, it was pretty much Tesla or bust, and buyers had to deal with all the endemic Tesla issues (build quality problems, bizarre ergonomics, weird styling, and so forth). That’s not the case today – there is a ton of competition, and while these newer models aren’t quite there when it comes to EV tech, they’re getting closer, and most of the Tesla weirdness just doesn’t apply. And then there’s this: stale product is the kiss of death in the car biz, and aside from the vanity project known as Cybertruck, all of Tesla’s stuff is old now. It’s not as “bleeding edge” as it used to be. For a company that made its’ bones on being on the forefront of tech, that’s a big problem.I don’t think Tesla is out of the game – not by a long shot. They’re still the market leader by a very wide margin, and their EV tech is the best in the game. But they need to stop focusing on stuff like the Cybertruck (technically fascinating, but it’s clearly an Elon Musk ego trip), the money/talent suck that is FSD, and the whole robotaxi thing, and put product first. At a minimum, everything they sell needs a very heavy refresh, and the entry level EV is a must.
Next