Respectful Tribute, or Unholy Changeling? Group of Bentley Diehards Toss 'Continuation' Models in the Latter Heap

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Bentley types are a discerning breed. Well versed in the world of leather and wood and highly respectful of heritage, these people interact with the brand like a museum curator. And the most discerning among them, those who claim to be most committed to preserving all that’s good and pure about the marque, aren’t happy with the automaker’s plan to hit “repeat.”

A present-day automaker churning out copies of a 90-year-old model? Blasphemy!

If you weren’t aware, last September saw Bentley announce plans to recreate a famous pre-war race car — the 1929 supercharged 4.5-litre “Blower” driven by Sir Tim Birkin’s Team Blower. Reverse engineered by the folks at Mulliner, a rear ’29 Blower would serve as the muse for 12 hand-built recreations. A “continuation” series, in OEM parlance, built via 3D digital scans and original tools and molds.

At the time, CEO Adrian Hallmark stated, “The twelve new Blowers will not only be an homage to our heritage, they will be a celebration of the outstanding skills of our Mulliner craftspeople. This is a new challenge for Bentley, but with the incredible success of the recent restoration of our 1939 one-of-one Corniche, we wanted to go one step further and make something even more special. Twelve lucky customers will soon be able to own a unique tribute to Bentley’s history.”

Lucky, indeed, as only four of the original purpose-built Blowers ever saw the light of day.

Not everyone’s pleased at Bentley’s move. As Autocar reports, a cadre of Bentley-loving bigwigs is out to challenge the automaker, accusing it in a signed letter of something approaching heresy.

From Autocar:

However, according to the letter, which is signed by such luminaries of the classic car world as Ralph Lauren, Lord Bamford, Evert Louwman and William E ‘Chip’ Connor, the run of Blower recreations would “dilute that special admiration and awe that can only come from viewing and embracing the genuine article”.

Most marques are the guardians of their own history, caretakers of records, cars and legacy,” said signatory Simon Kidston, renowned classic specialist and nephew of 1920s ‘Bentley Boy’ Glen Kidston. “When a major manufacturer starts building ‘genuine recreations’ decades out of period, which blur the line between real and fake and arguably devalue the authentic cars that private owners have cherished and preserved since long before manufacturers took an interest, it feels as if the gamekeeper has turned poacher.”

Bentley responded by saying its intentions were not to water down the importance or value of what came before, adding that it is aware of such a sentiment among brand diehards. Rather, by creating faithful reproductions — basically, the exact same car — the automaker said it can preserve the existing Blowers. The new builds can stand in for it at non-sporting, non-critical events.

“While we heard some similar concerns to those expressed in the letter, the vast majority of feedback was hugely supportive of the project. Hence we went ahead,” a company spokesperson said.

Bentley adds that the 12 new builds will feature a different paint job and graphics than the original, so as to be “instantly recognisable as continuation cars.”

[Images: Bentley]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Apr 23, 2020

    Way, _WAY_ above my pay grade but I'd enjoy driving a replica . I never heard about the centennial 'T' Model Fords, that sounds cool . -Nate

  • Schurkey Schurkey on Apr 23, 2020

    How are they going to make "exact" replicas when they're not allowed to put asbestos in the clutch and brake linings, or the gaskets? Does Saudi Arabia and Dubai (UAE) have emissions-control legislation? They'll have to go to North Korea to get metal crappy enough to match the original. The lathes and gear-hobbers will have to be deliberately worn-out and misadjusted. Machine tools used to make the originals probably don't exist any more. They gonna CNC-CAM these parts? How do they plan to weld the pieces together? Oxy-Acetylene? Don't get me started on tires 'n' tubes.

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next