Junkyard Find: 1995 Volvo 850 Turbo Wagon

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

When I’m strolling through my favorite junkyards and looking for significant bits of discarded automotive history, I’m always on the lookout for interesting Volvos. Thing is, my definition of interesting has long spanned the PV544/Amazon Era through the Late Rear-Wheel-Drive Brick Era, meaning that the universe of front- and all-wheel-drive Volvos beginning with the 1993 850 has been neglected in this series.

Lately, I’ve been making an effort to fill in some of those blank spots in the junkyard record, and so I went out and found a ’97 850R sedan and today’s find: this 1995 850 Turbo Wagon.

Volvo wagon owners tend to hang onto their cars for decades, come depreciation or expensive repairs, and this car stayed in action until nearly a quarter-million miles had passed beneath its tires.

This DOHC, 2.3-liter five-cylinder engine made 222 horsepower when new, making this 3,287-pound wagon good and quick.

American Volvo shoppers couldn’t get a manual transmission in the 850 Turbo Wagon in 1995, though the factory-hot-rod T-5R version could be had with three pedals, one year later.

Remember when factory cassette decks use to be targeted by thieves, and some cars had these maddening radios that required you to input a security code after disconnecting the battery? When I had my last junkyard-parts boombox-building party, we ran into this problem with a Volvo radio from this era. Fortunately, a previous owner had written down the code on the radio’s case.

The MSRP on this car came to $32,345, or about $55,700 in 2020 dollars. The Audi A6 wagon sold for $35,550 that year, the Mercedes-Benz E320 wagon went for $47,500, and the Passat wagon cost $21,320; all of those European competitors had less power than the 850 Turbo Wagon. Meanwhile, the enormous 1995 Buick Roadmaster Estate Wagon cost just $27,070 and had an underworked V8 generating 260 horsepower. If you wanted to stand out from the rest of the wagon crowd that year, however, you went for the Mitsubishi Diamante wagon, priced at $28,250 and getting 177 horses from its 6G72 V6 engine.

This commercial is for the 850 Turbo sedan, but you get the idea.

The little red sports car has finally grown up.

For links to 2,000+ more of these Junkyard Finds, head to The Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Lightspeed Lightspeed on Mar 31, 2020

    Single worst car I ever owned, and I owned a Malibu Maxx and a Sunbird. Every single system on these was crap, from the HVAC to the PCV. I bought it used for $3,200, spent $2,000 on repairs, sold it 10-months later for $1,100, one of the best days of my life.

  • Sikbrik Sikbrik on Mar 08, 2022

    If I had the room, I'd save every one of these. Yes more complex than my 245s, 745s, 965s but definitely a nice comfortable and capable car and, if you gather the necessary items for DIY, they're pretty easy to keep together well past 250k miles.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next