What Outsold Chrysler in 2019?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Not Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, mind you, but Chrysler. The brand. The maker of such diverse nameplates as the 300, which debuted in 2004, or the Pacifica and its ilk. Or the — wait, no, that’s it.

It’s easy to poke fun at Chrysler The Brand these days, what with Jeep and Ram doing the heavy lifting in terms of sales. As Matthew Guy recently told you, Ram bench-pressed some exceptionally heavy stacks this past year, sailing to new sales heights on the strength of two full-size pickups and a new HD model. Chrysler, barely mentioned in FCA’s recent five-year product plan, sunk to its lowest standing in decades.

Get this brand a new product that’s not just a variant of an existing minivan.

What outsold the Chrysler brand in 2019, you ask? It’s not hard to find an answer. The Mazda CX-5 we wrote about yesterday? That single model easily outsold the Chrysler brand, which unloaded 126,971 vehicles last year — a drop of 23 percent from 2018.

Peering elsewhere in the FCA stable, we can say that Jeep’s Cherokee outsold the Chrysler brand by nearly 70,000 vehicles, and it’s only the third-most popular Jeep model. The fourth-most popular Jeep, the Compass, leapfrogged Chrysler by roughly 17,000 units.

Put another way, Chrysler’s volume these days is about seven Alfa Romeos. Just under seven, to be exact. Which sounds large, until you realize you’d have to quintuple Alfa’s 2019 volume to match the Kia Forte. The Chevrolet Malibu, despite slipping 9 percent in a market that increasingly distrusts anything with a trunk, outsold Chrysler.

While the Chrysler brand gains a new entry for 2020, the Voyager minivan, the total volume of the combined minivans might not grow for the simple fact that the Voyager nameplate takes over for the bottom-rung trims of its Pacifica twin. Pacifica sales, it should be noted, sank 17 percent last year. As for the ancient 300, its days are numbered, and its sales lack the relative buoyancy of its LX-platform Dodge siblings. Americans bought 37 percent fewer 300s last year. U.S. car buyers purchased about half as many Dodge Challengers as they bought Chryslers (of any stripe) in 2019.

Going back in history, you’d have to time-travel to the dismal domestic year of 1981 to find a 12-month span where Chrysler sold fewer cars. It came close in 1992, but Reagan’s inaugural year saw the bankrupt company in the midst of a Lee Iacocca-led turnaround effort that hinged, initially, on a brace of cheap compacts that didn’t gain a Chrysler variant until MY1982.

Just to sledgehammer home the state of Chrysler today, in 2005 — the first full year of 300 production — the brand sold 649,293 vehicles and boasted a market share approaching 4 percent. Last year, the brand sold less than 20 percent of that total, with a market share well below 1 percent.

Late FCA boss Sergio Marchionne said Chrysler would become a “people-mover” brand shortly before his death, and subsequent alterations to the company’s product plan served to make Chrysler even more invisible as head office poured cash into Jeep and Ram. Dumping money into already hot-selling brands to generate even more product is not a bad idea; it’s just startling to see an automaker’s namesake brand tumble so far from the company’s radar.

Speculation about a wholly new model appearing in 2020 seems to have dried up, leaving the future existence of the electric Portal van/CUV promised two years ago in limbo.

Before we leave you, it’s worth pointing out that Chrysler sold three new 200s last quarter, bringing the total number of 200s sold in 2019 to 48. The model ceased production on December 2, 2016. A new Town & Country left an FCA lot sometime in Q4, too.

[Images: Chrysler Corp., Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Superdessucke Superdessucke on Jan 09, 2020

    Chrysler once sold 150,000 Cordobas a year, many of them no doubt Corinthian Leather clad. How times have changed. How low they have sunken.

  • Macmcmacmac Macmcmacmac on Jan 09, 2020

    My recenly purchased 200c hauls ass, looks great, and even gets decent mileage. All for not much more than the price of a new Mirage. Lot of car for the money.

  • FreedMike Not my favorite car design, but that blue color is outstanding.
  • Lorenzo Car racing is dying, and with it my interest. Midget/micro racing was my last interest in car racing, and now sanctioning body bureaucrats are killing it off too. The more organized it is, the less interesting it becomes.
  • Lorenzo Soon, the rental car lots will be filled with Kia's as far as the eye can see!
  • Lorenzo You can't sell an old man's car to a young man, but you CAN sell a young man's car to an old man (pardon the sexism, it's not my quote).Solution: Young man styling, but old man amenities, hidden if necessary, like easier entry/exit (young men gradually turn into old men, and will appreciate them).
  • Wjtinfwb Hmmm. Given that most Ford designs are doing relatively well in the marketplace, if this was forced I'd bet it was over the S650 Mustang. It's not a bad looking car but some angles seem very derivative of other makes, never a good trait for a car as distinctive as Mustang. And if he had anything to do with the abysmal dashboard, that's reason enough. Mustang doesn't need the "Tokyo by Night" dash arrangement of a more boring car. Analog gauges, a screen big enough for GPS, not Netflix and some decent quality plastics is plenty. The current set-up would be enough to dissuade me from considering a new Mustang.
Next