At Least for Cars, Preliminary U.S.-Japan Trade Deal Keeps the Status Quo

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s good news if you’re a U.S. farmer, however. A preliminary deal reached between the two countries this week would keep existing auto tariffs in place, though President Donald Trump claims there’s still the possibility of a hike.

It was the threat of import tariffs that brought Japan to the table following the U.S.’s 2017 pullout of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the agreement in principle announced this week keeps new tariffs off the table, though auto groups continue demanding action on an issue Lee Iacocca used to rail about: reciprocity.

Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe signalled an agreement on the core principles of the deal during the G7 summit in Biarritz, France on Sunday. That city, by the way, is surely well stocked with Cadillacs.

As reported by Reuters, the preliminary deal would cut agricultural tariffs and potentially spell a boon for U.S. producers of beef, pork, corn, wheat, wine, and other products. Certain Japanese industrial goods would be exempted from tariffs, as well. The deal aims to generate new demand for U.S. products hit hard by the ongoing U.S.-China trade war, as well as making the United States more competitive with TPP-signed nations.

“If you say ‘win-win,’ it’s a capital letter ‘Win’ for the U.S. and a small-letter ‘win’ for Japan,” former Japanese ambassador to the U.S. Ichiro Fujisaki told The Japan Times.

Not exempted from existing tariffs are Japanese cars and trucks. Inbound passenger cars will retain a 2.5-percent tariff, with trucks saddled with a 25-percent import levy. When asked about the possibility of following through on earlier tariff threats, Trump responded, “Not at this moment, no, not at this moment. It’s something I could do at a later date if I wanted to but we’re not looking at that.”

For the Detroit Three, in this case represented by the American Automotive Policy Council, the preliminary deal sparked a take on the age-old labor question “What have you done for me lately?”

“Any potential trade agreement with Japan should lead to truly reciprocal market access for U.S. automakers,” AAPC president Matt Blunt said in a statement. “It must address long-standing non-tariff barriers in Japan, and include strong and enforceable provisions that prevent Japan from manipulating its currency to gain an unfair and unearned advantage for its auto exports.”

The vast majority of the trade deficit between the U.S. and Japan — $56 billion — stems from the lopsided flow of automobiles.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Aug 27, 2019

    It seems like the horses are long gone, so the barn door isn't much of an issue. Ford is killing everything small in the US. GM is Chinese. Fiat is Italian. Various transplants might have opportunities for exports, but I don't see Japan having a growing car market in the future.

  • Slavuta Slavuta on Aug 27, 2019

    The Renegade, on the pic, is built in Italy. Are they bring them here and then ship to Japan?

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next