What Dealers Want: Mitsubishi's Still Hot for Pickups, but the Waiting Is the Hardest Part

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Comfortably secure in its Renault-Nissan Alliance embrace, Mitsubishi’s topmost desire is to see more dealerships in the United States. Ideally, a total of 400 by the end of this year. For dealers that actually sell Mitsubishis, product is top of mind — specifically, a truck.

Everyone’s getting into the game, yet Mitsubishi hasn’t fielded a pickup in the U.S. since the ill-fated Raider (a rebadged Dodge Dakota) met an ignominious end during the Great Recession. That’s expected to change now that Mitsu’s leading the midsize charge within the alliance. Still, those dealers can expect a long wait.

Wards Auto, which last year reported one Mitsu dealer describing the network’s wants as “a pickup truck, a pickup truck, a pickup truck,” claims dealers won’t get their wish until the automaker can ensure it has the right stuff to challenge Ford, General Motors, and Toyota.

“We would like to have (a pickup), but we’d have to have one that’s the right fit for Mitsubishi, for our demographic, and something that’s really competitive in the market,” Mark Chaffin, chief operating officer for Mitsubishi Motors North America, told the publication.

Last month, outgoing COO Trevor Mann revealed that Mitsu engineers have been tasked with creating a common pickup platform for use by all Alliance brands. As reported by Automotive News, the new platform will one day underpin the Triton, Nissan Navara, and Renault Alaskan. It might also form the basis of the next-generation Nissan Frontier, though a recent report claims the new model will appear late next year (as a 2021 model) with its existing platform in tow.

LMC Automotive data places the Frontier introduction a year later than that, but there’s no mention of its underpinnings. As for the next-gen Triton (the current version appeared in 2015 and gained upgrades and a styling refresh for 2019), LMC sees it coming to the U.S. in 2024 as a 2025 model. A five-year wait is probably not what dealers want to hear, but Chaffin isn’t interested in debuting an instant also-ran.

As it pulls back from the brink in the U.S., Mitsubishi hopes to grow its presence in underserved markets, Chaffin said — specifically, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, New York, and Boston. The brand added dealers in Virginia, Georgia, and Colorado this month. Still, the brand remains almost nonexistent in some markets.

“We’re not looking to crowd the market with our existing dealers, but we’re looking to spread the footprint, to get the Mitsubishi brand in front of more people,” he said.

U.S. sales rose 14 percent in 2018, with the first three months of 2019 showing a 17.6 percent gain. March was the brand’s best sales month since March of 2004.

[Images: Mitsubishi Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 28, 2019

    I doubt it would be as large an investment as designing ran all new truck. Take an existing product and use an existing plant. This has been done in the past. There are plenty of expensive trucks and yes it could be cheaper than the Frontier if it were made in Mexico. If you are assuming that the current Frontier will always be the same and not replaced Nissan has already stated that it will be replaced. Could take the current generation of Frontier and rebadge it as a Mitsubishi.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on May 04, 2019

    They're already importing the Mirage from Thailand, no? Bring over that blobby long-overhang truck-like object too, then.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next