Feds Probe UAW 'Flower Funds' in Broadening Corruption Case

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Federal investigators are expanding their ongoing corruption investigation into the United Auto Workers and Detroit Three by taking a long look at donated money intended to buy flowers for member funerals. The concern is that the UAW’s “flower fund” may have been used as a slush fund to finance personal expenses for union officials.

It wouldn’t be the first time. Prosecutors have already secured the convictions of seven people via a probe into the UAW-Chrysler National Training Center. Several jailed union officials, along with former FCA-VP Alphons Iacobelli, helped investigators uncover illicit funds funneled through training centers and charities — including the Leave the Light On Foundation, created by the late General Holiefield. Now they’re helping the feds branch out.

According to The Detroit News, the flower fund is just one of several avenues being explored right now. Investigators are keen to find out why UAW officials used almost $1 million of membership dues on meals, alcohol, condominiums, and golf in California — where former Region 5 Director Gary Jones held annual conferences before becoming UAW president last year — as well as uncover the source of that cash.

With Fiat Chrysler already implicated in the scandal, investigations broadened to probe to see if UAW leaders at General Motors and Ford ever received money or benefits through their tax-exempt nonprofits.

Flower funds were created initially to pool voluntary contributions from union members for funeral flowers and to finance union election campaigns. Use of the funds has drawn repeated scrutiny from federal and congressional investigators since at least the middle of the last century.

From The Detroit News:

In the ongoing UAW investigation, agents are questioning whether flower fund contributions became a mandatory job requirement and whether UAW executives spent the money on personal expenses and kept the rest upon retirement, sources told The News.

When UAW Vice President General Holiefield retired in 2014 as head of the union’s Fiat Chrysler Department, sources told The News he kept the more than $30,000 remaining in his flower fund. Holiefield died in 2015.

[Dennis] Williams also had a flower fund. A source said he did not keep money remaining in it when he retired as UAW president last summer.

Unsavory claims involving the funds have encouraged investigations of the UAW and other unions in recent decades, as they frequently involved workers in fear of losing their job unless they contributed part of their salaries. However, these probes rarely managed to find anything truly damning. But there is an alleged smoking gun. Those with knowledge of the investigation suggest that even if dozens of staff members contributed to a single flower fund, it would generate thousands of dollars in unreported revenue every single month — likely more than necessary to furnish funeral decorations.

Included in the flower funds of interest is the “Diamond Fund,” which sources say was controlled by retired UAW Vice President Norwood Jewell — who was slapped by federal prosecutors with union conspiracy charges earlier this week. Jewell is scheduled to plead guilty on April 2nd, but flower funds aren’t part of his case. While the UAW imposed a “gift ban” after prosecutors began indicting former UAW and Fiat Chrysler officials in the summer of 2017, it’s unclear whether voluntary flower donations were included.

Still, investigators are examining whether or not the donations truly were discretionary. Allegations have surfaced that union members were effectively bullied into giving a portion of their annual income to similar funds. Likewise, several UAW members wrapped up in the current scandal claim they were threatened by upper management if they refused to play the corruption game.

“The consequences of a failure to do as you have been told would have quickly led you back into a factory and to be ostracized by UAW leadership,” lawyer Robert Sheehan wrote in a court filing for former union official Keith Mickens.

Since investigators appear to be repositioning for another push, this may turn out to be a dead end. However, even if that ends up being the case, don’t expect the fed to give up on investigating the UAW or its relationship with manufacturers.

[Image: James R. Martin/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 18 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 23, 2019

    How much money are we talking about - one million? I've heard the Feds know how to misappropriate the odd dollar or so as well. What will the investigation cost?

    • See 3 previous
    • Jatz Jatz on Mar 25, 2019

      @civicjohn You have to be familiar with the world of teacher education to grasp how many innocent, child-loving young people are attracted to it. Most of the poor fools never realize in time that kids are the last priority for teacher admin and government. The few that do become admin.

  • Civicjohn Civicjohn on Mar 25, 2019

    Agreed. I dated a girl in college that was studying to be a teacher. I would ask her if she knew that she wasn’t going to make too much money, but she wanted to “work with kids and help them out”. We ultimately went our separate ways, I saw her a couple of years after graduation, and she was sharing an apartment with another teacher. She ultimately fixed her situation by marrying a doctor and hasn’t worked a day since, so good for her. When it became time for my son to decide what career to choose (he has Aspergers), I tried to push him into coding, as I had researched and found out that Aspergers kids do really well with detail oriented jobs. However, he could draw completely accurate 3-D drawings when he was 4 (mostly the interior and exterior of homes and buildings), then he jumped into Lego buildings (I have a 12-foot table he coined “Lego City” to prove it), and Minecraft, so the writing was on the wall for him to choose architecture. I was scared as a parent, but he was accepted into one of the top 5 Architectural Schools in the US, and my family has a close relationship with the leading architecture firm in the state, and they also have offices in London and Tokyo, so he’s got a summer internship with them every year and he’ll be doing his senior overseas work at the London office, so I think he’ll be just fine. If it sounds like I’m bragging about him, maybe I am, but we made sure as a family that we could help him. And he’s not adding to the ridiculous student loan crisis - he has a job in the Architecture School Print Center - I thought he was running around breathing Xerox toner fumes, but he explained to me over the holidays that he helped students and professors download their projects from the cloud and routing them to the proper 3-D printer. Shows how much this old man knows!

    • See 1 previous
    • Civicjohn Civicjohn on Mar 25, 2019

      @jatz Why thank you, jazt. Yes I’m absolutely blessed. He just got back from Spring Break at St. Simons Island with Habitat for Humanity. While he did get to spend 2-3 days on the beach, they painted a bridge to stop the rusting, and repaired several houses. He called me before the trip, and I could hear the trepidation in his voice when he asked me if I could give him the $100 for the cost of the trip, which included an 8-hour bus ride, meals, and hotel. I have never sent an Apple Payment any quicker! As for me, I can’t even screw in a nail... ,

  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next