Rocked by GM's Plant Cull, Ontario Seeks to Shore Up Its Auto Sector

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors’ decision to stop the flow of product to Ontario’s Oshawa Assembly plant by the end of 2019 has the province’s government promising cash and a slew of measures to keep the auto industry alive north of the border.

Ontario holds the bulk of Canada’s auto-related manufacturing jobs, with the sector adding up to nearly one-fifth of the province’s manufacturing GDP. Vehicles and parts made up 28 percent of its trade exports in 2015. On Thursday, the Ontario government rolled out the first phase of a 10-year plan to firm up the industry and make automakers reconsider Mexican investment.

The volume of Canadian-built vehicles fell by 25 percent since 2000, and GM’s decision to turn the lights out in Oshawa won’t help the trend. At last report, 13 percent of North America’s auto production occurs in Ontario.

Titled “Driving Prosperity: The Future of Ontario’s Automotive Sector,” the plan lays out a number of initiatives, among them: $40.2 million over the next three years for internships, an online learning and training portal, and an automotive modernization program. International promotion is another plank, as are “supports” for R&D and emerging technologies.

Grouped under three pillars — talent, innovation, and competitive business climate — the plan makes no shortage of promises to existing and prospective auto sector companies. Mainly, a potential reduction in the electricity rate for certain manufacturers, a reduction in red tape and a modernization of existing regulations, and a reduction in taxes. If some of those sound like promises made to all companies by conservative governments the world over, you’re right. There’s finer specifics contained in the plan, but that’s the gist. A second phase of the plan should emerge from the Doug Ford government by the end of the year.

Looking through the document, one wonders how a government of any stripe would go about maintaining “current assembly production volume and [securing] new assembly commitments.” No government in this country seems able to compel private manufacturing operations to stay open or expand without a liberal application of taxpayer cash. Well, it certainly appears that way.

Regardless, this government feels it can pull in new auto manufacturing, with a job site challenge being one tool in that strategy. The province describes it as “a competition, open to municipalities, economic development corporations, and industrial developers, for a site (500 to 1,500 acres) capable of attracting a new assembly plant. Ontario would partner with the winning proponent on site-readiness and servicing to ensure the development opportunity is competitive.”

Other tools include “improving the transparency and stability of property tax assessments” and “[streamlining] the approvals and certification process for auto manufacturing sites.”

It’s an effort, anyway — one that could prove successful. Still, one has to wonder what phase two holds.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Feb 14, 2019

    Awesome, but how can those enticements begin to compare with Mexico autoworkers? And I'm not just talking pay scales.

    • Mikey Mikey on Feb 14, 2019

      To answer your question "DenverMike" ... They can't .

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Feb 14, 2019

    US is such an evil racist capitalist country, why Canadian do not invite caring and progressive Japanese and Germans automakers to open plants in Canada?

  • SilverHawk 2031: A Car Odessey"Car, Let me have the steering wheel."'Sorry John. I can't do that.'
  • Bouzouki Hmm. So, can this system detect the root cause of why the driver may be having a "bad day"?Can the system detect when the driver is leaving a GM dealership after an expensive repair (or maintenance, like clearing the carbon deposits on the intake valves of that direct-injected "affordable" 3-cylinder Trax for $1200), or when GM certified says "sorry, that's not covered in your "LIMITED Bumper-to-bumper warranty"?I wonder.Those experiences can make drivers angry and upset.
  • Sobhuza Trooper How Can Unions Break Through in the South?Next up: How can cancer tumors grow, despite chemo and radiation therapy.
  • 1995 SC So with a lease the better the car holds it's value then the better you come out since the lease is basically paying the depreciation over the terms of the lease, correct? Assuming it isn't a factory subsidized lease to move a bunch of turds anyway. So if one isn't sure if the company is going to be around lease end, wouldn't that kill the residual and make these bad lease deals (or worse than a lease on something known to hold it's value)? I've always looked at leases as something companies that needed vehicles did.
  • MaintenanceCosts The parts all exist for Toyota to build a Corolla Cross with a 2.4L turbo four and a manual. Required design effort would be almost zero. Certification cost would be more.That would be a vehicle worthy of the GR name.Does Toyota have the guts?
Next