Aiming Higher: 2020 Range Rover Evoque Ups the Class, Not the Size

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

During Jaguar Land Rover’s unveiling of the updated version of its smallest Range Rover model, the automaker made sure everyone knew the only carryover components from the not-fully-baked first-generation model were the door hinges. This is not your realtor’s Evoque, JLR assures us.

Revealed in its native UK, the second-gen Range Rover Evoque — arriving next year as a 2020 model — keeps the tidy footprint of its predecessor while boosting the model’s high-zoot trappings and technology. It’s more powerful, greener, and capable off-road than before, JLR claims, and there’s no longer even a whiff of Ford about the thing. Under that hood is an engine proudly flying the Union Jack.

There’s no mistaking it as an Evoque, either, though observers will no doubt notice a design that’s moved in the direction of the lengthier Velar. Still, the gripes hurled at the first-gen model, which first appeared in 2010, were not styling related. And there were many gripes hurled, no doubt about it.

With the 2020 model, JLR sought to correct past mistakes. Beneath the upcoming Evoque is a new platform — JLR’s Premium Transverse Architecture, which affords rear-seat passengers an extra eight-tenths of an inch of legroom via a mild wheelbase stretch. Keep in mind that it’s the same sized package as before, so miracles aren’t plentiful here. Improvements, yes. In addition to a body that’s 13 percent stiffer than before, cargo volume expands by 6 percent, to 21.5 cubic feet. Fold that rear bench down, and 50.5 cubes greet the proud Evoque owner.

Power-wise, the UK-market Evoque makes use of two Ingenium four-cylinder powerplants, each offered in three flavors. We’ll skip over the diesel offerings, focusing instead on the gas-powered motors most likely to see service on this side of the Atlantic. The 2.0-liter Ingenium range starts at 197 horsepower and 251 lb-ft of torque, moves up to 246 hp and 269 lb-ft, and tops out at 296 hp and 295 lb-ft. It’s the latter two engines we’ll be seeing here, if Jaguar’s U.S.-market XE powerplants tell us anything.

Joining these two engines is a 48-volt mild-hybrid system, which captures energy lost through braking and coasting and stores it in an underfloor battery pack. The juice returns to the drivetrain through a belt-integrated starter generator, providing a boost during acceleration and allowing the Evoque to shut down its internal combustion engine at speeds below 11 mph, though only if the brakes are being applied. In a year’s time, a three-cylinder plug-in hybrid should show its face.

All-wheel drive comes standard (UK drivers get a 2WD manual diesel), with multiple terrain modes to choose from, though JLR offers an Auto mode for owners who’d prefer the vehicle governs itself. Water fording, a chief concern for all Evoque owners, improves with this new model. You’ll now be able to tackle 23.6 inches of the wet stuff, up from 19.7 inches in the first-gen model. Should you be of the adventurous type, JLR’s ground view camera, which monitors the area ahead of and below the front bumper, might just prevent your oil pan from being carried away by a jutting slab of granite.

Inside and out, luxury cues abound. LED lighting fore and aft lends a contemporary premium feel, and flush door handles, while wholly unnecessary, nonetheless scream “I’ve paid for this — it’s worth it!” As you can see, the Evoque’s dash doesn’t lack padding, nor touchscreen acreage. The dual-screen setup is an optional feature, pairing two 10-inch surfaces in the center stack with a 12.3-inch digital gauge display.

Lastly, you’ll find both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard kit on this vehicle, allowing the Evoque to offer the same level of connectivity as many generic compact sedans. What’ll a new Evoque set you back, you ask? The automaker isn’t telling, preferring to release its U.S. pricing at the 2019 Chicago Auto Show.

[Images: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on Nov 24, 2018

    Very interesting, but came a little too late for me.

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Nov 26, 2018

    There may be no carryover from the previous Evoque but this is just a slightly shorter Velour. Shame, I didn't think we needed another slab-sided refrigerator of a "range rover."

  • 3-On-The-Tree In my life before the military I was a firefighter EMT and for the majority of the car accidents that we responded to ALCOHOL and drugs was the main factor. All the suggested limitations from everyone above don’t matter if there is a drunken/high fool behind the wheel. Again personal responsibility.
  • Wjtinfwb NONE. Vehicle tech is not the issue. What is the issue is we give a drivers license to any moron who can fog a mirror. Then don't even enforce that requirement or the requirement to have auto insurance is you have a car. The only tech I could get behind is to override the lighting controls so that headlights and taillights automatically come on at dusk and in sync with wipers. I see way too many cars after dark without headlights, likely due to the automatic control being overridden and turned to "Off". The current trend of digital or electro-luminescent dashboards exacerbates this as the dash is illuminated, fooling a driver into thinking the headlights are on.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh given the increasing number of useless human scumbags who use their phones while driving (when it is not LIFE AND DEATH EMERGENCY) there has to be a trade off.It is either this, or make phone use during driving a moving violation that can suspend a license.
  • Wjtinfwb Great. Another Solyndra boondoggle wasting the tax dollars we contribute and further digging us into debt. The saying, "don't listen to what they say, watch what they do" has never been more accurate. All this BS talk about "preserving Democracy" and "level playing fields" are just words. The actions say, "we don't give a damn about democracy, we want to pick the winners and use the taxpayer revenue to do it". 100 million is chump change in auto development and manufacturing and doling that out in 300k increments is just a colossal waste. Nothing happens in a large manufacturing enterprise for 300k., it's a rounding error. A symbolic gesture. Ford and GM likely spend 300k designing a new logo for the 12V battery that runs your radio. For EV development it's a fart in a Hurricane.
  • Bd2 Let's Go Brandon!
Next