QOTD: Driving Down Educational Memory Lane?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Each one of you here in the peanut gallery learned to drive at one point or another. And whether that was via a proper driving school, or, perhaps for the older types, at the wheel of a friend or relative’s car, the memories are there just the same. Today we talk driver’s education and the car which withstood your naive mistreatment. It’s story time.

Botched gear changes, following distances, passing rules, jerky turns, squealing tires. Driver’s ed is hard on students, but harder on the cars. Long hours are spent in the classroom on books and videos, as instructors attempt to scare the speed out of you and replace it with pure caution and defensive driving. Did it work? A little.

I can remember how nervous I was when it was finally time to get behind the wheel. I’d been waiting so long for this moment — a validation on my driving excellence. The Audi 5000 was waiting as well, parked patiently on the street until I got my permit. In Indiana there’s a 30-hour requirement for classroom instruction, followed by six hours of time behind the wheel before a 15-year-old can apply for a permit. Surely my patience would be rewarded with a fantastic car with which to demonstrate my skills.

Uh, no. It was one of these. A circa 2002 beige Chevrolet Cavalier, in terrible Ace of Base trim. With an automatic transmission and air conditioning, it was bereft of performance. The Internet tells me it had a 2.2-liter four-cylinder that produced a shocking 115 horsepower. Those horses had to motivate 2,676 pounds of car, plus three teens and an adult. Sluggish and awful, I can remember how inferior it was to the 1987 Audi at home, even with its lifter-ticking inline-five engine. Summer temps in the 80s and 90s and a lack of window tint meant the air conditioning couldn’t keep the nervous sweat from the back of my neck. The driving part was tough, too.

The main problem that stands out all these years later is my initial lack of understanding where the center of the lane was. Especially on two-lane roads, my fear of hugging the center line and clipping an oncoming car meant I hugged the right side line, getting close to clipping mailboxes and signs. I did fare better than one of the other members of my driving group — an individual who found it incomprehensible that the wheel must be turned opposite to the desired direction of travel when reversing.

Let it all out; let’s hear about your driver’s ed experiences.

[Images: Ford, GM]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 84 comments
  • THX1136 THX1136 on Nov 01, 2018

    For the driving portion of DE I was by myself with the instructor. We did not use the provided DE car, we used the instructors personal ride - a 60 something Pontiac Catalina (or was it a Grand Prix?) convertible in red. Drove during one hour of school time - 2 pm. First time drive was from my town to a neighboring larger town (county seat) on a road which crossed a river. The bridge was an older style with a superstructure. I was glued and near motionless when going through that bridge - first time no oncoming, second time with oncoming. The instructor actually complimented my driving, especially after he found out it was my first time behind the wheel. It was dang scary for me. Like with many things, it got easy with more practice. I don't remember why I did the solo thing. It could be I had no other time available as I had an after school job. I was actually looking forward to having friends along like most others did.

    • THX1136 THX1136 on Nov 01, 2018

      Actual test drive car was the family 66 Dodge Coronet 500 with a 383 hemi in it. Did well - even with parallel parking (which I do not remember practicing during DE ever).

  • JimC2 JimC2 on Nov 03, 2018

    Late 1980s Toyota Corolla, four cylinder automatic. The driving school sign strapped to the roof hurt freeway performance pretty bad, but out of all the lessons I think we only made a few runs from one entrance to the next offramp. The sign didn't interfere with city driving or parallel parking.* * That is if you can call my several~ish feet from the curb "parallel parking..." three feet or closer notwithstanding, I'm pretty sure that part of the vehicle was obstructing the travel lane of those subdivision streets. The driving examiner didn't mind since I carefully checked my surroundings and used my signals.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next