Rental Companies Should Be Worried About What's Gaining in Their Rear-view

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

For a product or service to dominate a body of customers, another must fade to the background. Think of direct and alternating current, or perhaps digital cameras and 35mm film.

It gets a little fuzzier when the topic of personal transportation arises. Some modes of transport are so much more more useful than what they replaced (cars and horses, jetliners and ocean liners) that the preceding mode is relegated to a niche category. In others comparisons, the usefulness of a certain mode remains strong only in certain areas. Think trains.

But in a car-based world, consumers now have more options than ever in how they get around when their personal vehicle is left sitting at home. A recent survey shows just how pleasant regular car renters find app-based ride-hailing services, and traditional rental companies would be foolish to not take note.

The survey, conducted by consulting firm AlixPartners, asked 2,000 Americans who rented a car in the past year about their experience — and opinion — of ride-hailing services. As you might expect, consumers are learning the appeal of getting a lift from the street corner or address of their of their choice just by opening up the Uber or Lyft app on their phone. With cheaper rates than a taxi service and no need for a pricey add-ons, ride-hailing can offer a viable alternative to renting a car at the airport.

Thanks to services like GM’s Maven or Turo, longer trips out of (or around) town can also be had without visiting the Enterprise, Avis, or Budget counter. The future holds more potential choice. Autonomous driving technology is at the core of Waymo’s ride-hailing plan, and others, like Uber and Lyft, want a piece of that action. According to AlixPartners (via The Detroit Bureau), rental companies need to change their business model in a hurry if they hope to survive the coming decades.

“Results from our survey suggest that the $30-billion U.S. car-rental industry is already undergoing a tectonic shift, with boundaries not just blurring but being obliterated between car-rental and ride-hailing and other forms of new mobility,” said Arun Kumar, a director in AlixPartners’ Automotive and Industrial Practice.

“The companies that survive this shift will be those that act now to transform themselves to be relevant in a world which seems to much prefer simply clicking on an app than standing in line at the rental counter.”

So, what did the survey reveal? Some 35 percent of respondents say they’ve replaced a rental with ride-hailing services in the past year. Of those who were aware of the existence of ride-hailing services (but have never used it), 48 percent say they’d switch if the cost falls 20 percent below that of renting.

Perhaps even more worrisome — to rental agencies, anyway — is that those who have used ride-hailing as a rental alternative seem to prefer the service. Of the rental respondents, 83 percent rate their ride-hailing experience as “very positive” or “somewhat positive.” Rental services garner a positive rating of only 72 percent.

What don’t renters like about the rental experience? Top of mind is the “laborious” rental process for 35 percent of respondents, followed closely by pricey add-on charges (34 percent). Twenty percent cited limited vehicle choice as their top gripe.

If this wasn’t enough to go on, rental companies might want to take note of this finding: Of the respondents who used a ride-hailing service, 49 percent said the greatest appeal came from its ease of use. Just a tap of the phone away.

Also, rental reputation does not necessarily translate into a more pleasant experience. From the survey:

The AlixPartners survey also finds that—despite attempts at brand-positioning by various companies in the rental-car industry over the years—consumers’ rating of their experience with what the industry generally considers “premium” and “mid-tier” brands aren’t much higher than with “value” brands—and in some cases are lower. In fact, according to the survey, on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being “very negative” and 5 being “very positive,” only 0.5 points separated the highest-ranked brand of the 17 largest rental-car companies and the lowest-ranked. And that highest-ranked brand wasn’t even a “premium” one.

If there’s a silver lining for rental companies, it’s that “only 18% of those surveyed currently say they’re willing to purchase a ride-hailing subscription for a set number of rides—thought by many to be that industry’s preferred business model.”

[Images: © 2017 Jack Baruth/TTAC, Turo]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • Tonyola Tonyola on Aug 01, 2018

    I can tell you what the problem is, at least for the Sunbelt states - there aren't any more Chrysler LeBaron convertibles on rental lots.

  • Road_pizza Road_pizza on Aug 01, 2018

    I'll stick with rental cars, thankyouverymuch. When I want to go somewhere I want to leave NOW, not when some ride-hailer shows up. And I like to, you know, like, change my route on a whim, among other things? Ride hailing services are for one thing and one thing only... getting how from the bar when I've had a wee bit too much. Period.

  • Tassos ELON ONCE HELPED ME WITH MY COMEDY SCRIPT. WE DID GHB TOGETHER. I STAYED FOR A FEW DAYS AND FED HIS CAT ON DAY 3.
  • Medfordjim my daily driver is a 2008 Sable Premier black/black. Only 48K miles - it was my mom's Sunday car. It's got the Sync system with bluetooth. It works pretty well but will occasionally not pair when the car starts, and then it seems to take 5-10 minutes before it will rescan and find my phone.Otherwise, the only recurring issue is the solenoids that control the HVAC - I just replaced the passenger side one. I think the drivers side one failed a couple of times. Thankfully mom had the extended warranty because that side is a b*tch to fix.
  • Tassos When these were new I was still driving my DEATH TRAP TIN CAN 1991 CIVIC. It was already PAST its expiration date but any extra funds I had were going to REMEDIATING my Eastern Europe bare land purchase and trying to avoid FORECLOSURE on my Midwest shack. I wouldn’t make it out of POVERTY for another 10 years (INHERITANCES REALLY HELPED THERE). Now I am rich TASSOS driving diesel Mercedes through Eastern Europe countryside and bustling Midwest suburb.
  • Proud2BUnion I've always been a fan of the Taurus/Sable, and Husker Du!
  • Irvingklaws 2005 Honda Accord at about 125k miles - oil change, replace bad starter (also intake gasket), front and rear brakes, state inspection, about $1200 at a local garage. Front brakes were replaced free under warrantee because they were done last year. 2015 Mazda CX-5 with 102k - Took to dealer to diagnose "clunk" on takeoff and transmission slow to engage. After pointing out an apparent transmission leak and that nearly every bushing/boot under the car is cracked and/or failing in their inspection video, service techs said everything "looked safe". They tightened the cowl bolts in an (unsuccessful) attempt to address the clunk, completely side-stepped the transmission leak ("...it's a sealed unit, we can't touch it except to replace it entirely...") and charged me $450. About $33k to replace it with a new '24 Forester. Will be working on diagnosing and reconditioning the Mazda myself in the coming days...🙂
Next