Junkyard Find: 1986 Toyota MR2

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Toyota MR2 has always been a somewhat rare Junkyard Find, partly because not many were sold in the first place, and partly because the surviving examples tend to be cherished by MR2 enthusiasts. Here’s a solid ’86 that showed up in a Denver self-service wrecking yard a couple of weeks back.

Judging from the line of silt visible at about driver waist level, this car spent some time partially submerged. The most likely culprit is the flooding along Colorado’s Front Range in September, 2013. During the first couple of years after the 2013 floods, Denver-area wrecking yards were well stocked with flood victims, including some real heartbreakers.

Before the deluge, this car traveled well over 200,000 miles. MR2s are surprisingly sensible commuter cars.

This one even has the optional air conditioning, a must for those hot Denver summers in a tiny car.

I have seen dozens, maybe hundreds, of first-generation MR2s racing in the 24 Hours of Lemons during my decade with the series, and I have learned that this car is not so great at low-budget endurance racing.

Like most Toyotas in the Lemons series, the MR2 suffers from severe reliability problems, and most 4AGE-powered ones are no quicker around a road course than their 1980s Ford Escort GT, Honda Civic, and Volkswagen Golf competitors (having been an MR2 admirer since these cars were new, this knowledge disappoints me). With a Camry V6 swap, though, an MR2 can turn some decent lap times.

The flood damage is more obvious in person than it is in photographs, so nobody is likely to buy it and fix all the water-damaged electrical stuff. I saw it a couple of days ago, and few parts had been pulled. Is it possible every Colorado MR2 collector already has all the parts they need?

The most innovatory value!

Watch out for the pop bumpers while driving your MR2.






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • CrackedLCD CrackedLCD on Jun 13, 2017

    I consider my first car — an 86 NA — my first true automotive love. It came to me with 98k on it and left me with 262k and was pretty trouble-free in between. It was a lot of fun for a castaway that a couple of old parents were trying to sell for their son, who'd taken a job overseas. They didn't want the old bondo'd thing in their yard anymore. The worst issue I remember it having was it began popping out of fifth gear. I actually drove it from Alabama to California and back by way of Canada, holding it in fifth with my right arm the entire way (keeping in fourth would have been noisy madness.) It sounds crazy but actually wasn't that uncomfortable. I've never had a car that more perfectly matched car to human in the interface, everything just fell right into place.

  • Jansob Jansob on Feb 25, 2018

    A friend of mine bought a red one new in 1986 and drove it until he passed away in 2012. When he could no longer ride his motorcycle due to health problems in 2009, he had it buffed and detailed, rebuilt the front end, put sticky tires on it and took it for a fast outing at least once a week. We made some great memories on rural Texas roads. When he passed away his wife gave it to his brother (also a car guy), and it's still going at over 600k. Really awesome car.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next