GM Fires Its Venezuelan Workforce, Many by Text, as It Flees Country

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Last week, General Motors’ long-idled Venezuela assembly plant fell into the hands of the country’s autocratic government, sparking the automaker’s exit from the strife-ridden nation.

With its material assets out of its hands, the automaker’s Venezuelan subsidiary jettisoned the plant’s entire 2,700-person workforce today, Reuters reports. It did so in as abrupt a manner as the takeover itself. Meanwhile, the government wants to chat.

According to one longtime employee, his company email account was deactivated over the weekend. Today, he told Reuters that, “We all received a payment and a text message.”

That story was the same for another worker, who claimed, “Our former bosses told us the executives left and we were all fired. There is no longer anyone in the country.”

The plant hadn’t produced a vehicle since 2015, given the country’s dire economic situation. At the time of the seizure, local media claimed the takeover stemmed from a 17-year-old lawsuit over nullified contracts with Chevrolet dealers in the city of Maracaibo. In response, GM stated it would cease operations there immediately.

One report stated one of the plant’s unions had taken over the plant weeks before the facility fell into government hands, with company officials barred from entering by union members.

Now, it seems that the country’s government would like the automaker to reconsider. According to Reuters, the government of Nicholas Maduro claims it doesn’t want to expropriate the 35-year-old facility, and would like GM to return.

“To the current General Motors president of Venezuela, Jose Cavaileri: You come here, show your face and share with us the options to restore normality,” Labor Minister Francisco Torrealba said today.

Based on GM’s actions and the fact that neither it, nor any other automaker, has been able to build or sell vehicles in any appreciable quantity in the country in recent years, the outlook for an agreement doesn’t look good. GM previously stated it would pursue all legal options to defend its rights.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • Don1967 Don1967 on Apr 25, 2017

    Another Participant medal for socialism. But by all means keep trying. I'm sure we'll find our perfect, iron-fisted, spirit-crushing utopia someday.

  • Pig_Iron Pig_Iron on Apr 25, 2017

    Wasn't that plant already idled last year, and only running a skeleton crew since 2014?

  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
  • FreedMike I don't think they work very well, so yeah...I'm afraid of them. And as many have pointed out, human drivers tend to be so bad that they are also worthy of being feared; that's true, but if that's the case, why add one more layer of bad drivers into the mix?
  • ChristianWimmer I have two problems with autonomous cars.One, I LOVE and ENJOY DRIVING. It’s a fun and pleasurable experience for me. I want to drive my cars, not be driven by them.Two, if autonomous cars have been engineered to a standard where they work 100% flawlessly and don’t cause accidents, then freedom-hating governments like the POS European Union or totally idiotic current German government can literally make laws which ban private car ownership in their quest to save the world from climate change bla bla bla…
Next