Ace of Base: Single Cab, 3/4-Ton Diesel Trucks

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Let’s get one thing straight right from the start: like last week, this comparison isn’t going to change anyone’s mind. Truck buyers are a notoriously loyal lot, so the online bleatings of a shrimp-filled journalist are unlikely to curry favor with folks whose work boots are firmly entrenched in one of these three camps.

Thing is, though, I do know a thing or two about trucks. Plus, I had a deadline to meet and needed a topic for today. Having recently completed the trifecta by finally getting the chance to drive all three diesel behemoths listed here, I started to ask myself how these workhorses would compare in single cab, four-wheel drive, base trim. Fleet managers, please click on through: we’re about to step into the world of bare-bones diesel trucks.

All three trucks, equipped as regular cab, diesel, four-wheel-drive models, are within a pencil’s width of each other in terms of price. Configured this way but sans optional frippery, the Ford F-250 XL, Ram 2500 Tradesman, and Chevrolet Silverado 2500 WT sticker for $45,420, $45,540, and $46,865 respectively. At this price point, I’d call that pretty equal footing.

The same can be said for safety features. All of these trucks find themselves equipped with a raft of airbags and stability control systems, items that my grandfather could only dream in his mid-‘80s GMC. All manner of theft-deterrent appears as standard equipment, lest a miscreant attempt to jack your honest working truck from the job site.

I will argue heartily against those who feel their base trucks need to feel like a penalty box. Today’s economies of scale assure us of better equipment levels in base rides – take the backup camera and power seat in the $20,000 Chevy Colorado as a good example. In the land of heavy-duty diesel, Chevy’s $1,300 price premium buys shoppers a few creature comforts over its Detroit rivals. Power door locks are standard, as is cruise control. These features must be cobbled together through a myriad of optional packages on the other trucks.

Naturally, these trucks are purchased for their brawny payload and towing performance, and all three offer capacities far exceeding anything found in non-commercial showrooms only a few short years ago. Nary a truck in this trio puts out fewer than 900 lb-ft of torque or accepts less than a ton of payload. Let’s examine the individual numbers, keeping in mind that all the gonzo towing ratings are for fifth-wheel hauling.

Ram’s 6.7-liter Cummins inline-six is rated at 385 hp and 900 lb-ft of torque. Despite these heady numbers, it’s the lowest output of the group. So, too, are its maximum recommended towing and payload limits: 17,610 lbs and 2583 lbs, respectively. The 30,000-lb towing figure is marketing bravado reserved for more expensive trims. Ram usurped its competition in torque and towing ratings the last time it redesigned the Ram, and I expect it will do the same when the new Ram appears, whenever that may be. For now, though, this is where the Ram sits.

The option of a six-speed stickshift in the Ram severely tests my love for all things manual but in the real world, an automatic is the more logical option. If you’ve ever experienced the misery of trying to reverse an 8,000-lb trailer up a slight incline with a three-pedal pickup truck, then you know what I’m on about. Skilled haul tractor-trailer drivers may freely laugh at my protestations. Also, it’s worth noting that choosing to row-row-row-your-Ram cuts towing capacity by more than a couple of thousand pounds.

Dearborn introduced its new Super Duty for the 2017 model year, marking a return to a shared cab with its little half-ton brother. The 6.7-liter PowerStroke diesel V8 makes the most grunt of all three trucks, powerstroking its way to 440 hp and 925 lb-ft of twist. Choosing to plow some of its aluminium weight savings back into the chassis, the burly Ford sees its maximum payload crest 3,000 lbs, meaning one could drop a Mazda MX-5 in the bed and still have almost 700 lbs to spare. Fifth-wheel towing maxes out at about 16,000 lbs.

Inside, drivers should expect to find vinyl seats and a hose-it-out rubber covered floor, and the interior design is light years ahead of last year’s festival of plastic. While fancy pants Lariat and Platinum trims look great, I still get more than a whiff of poverty in the XL Super Duty. The big grille and headlights which work so well on swanky examples look very utilitarian on the base truck.

We drove the new-for-2017 Duramax in Texas a few months ago and while its torque is not at the top of the diesel pile (yes, we live in a world where 910 lb-ft is not the highest torque rating in a non-commercial truck), its 6.6-liter Duramax V8 does have five more horses in the stable than a PowerStroke. Despite its 6,671-lb curb weight, a base model WT can accept a 2,880-lb payload or confidently hook itself to a 15,900-lb fifth-wheel trailer.

Proving once again that there’s no plate like chrome, Chevy sees fit to garnish the front of its heavy hauler with a good dose of the shiny stuff, rather than force customers to choose a dark color in an effort to hide acres of black plastic. Styling is extremely subjective, but the Silverado looks the best of the three to this jaundiced eye. The option of $0 cloth seats and a standard fully automatic locking rear differential in the Chevy makes a difference, too.

This means, then, that I gotta go with the Chevy. Sure, the DEF refill remains annoyingly under the hood and the squared-off styling is not to everyone’s taste, but it’s hard to argue with capability and value compared to the other two trucks — even if it is about $1,300 dearer than its cross-town rivals. I can hear the die-hard brand loyalists hammering away on their keyboards already…

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The models above is shown in Trump Bucks, absent of regional incentives and cash allowances. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
21 of 65 comments
  • NoID NoID on Mar 22, 2017

    Might as well go straight to the 1-ton dually single cab standard bed. Now that's a unicorn you don't generally see. And it will only cost you about forty grand!

    • See 12 previous
    • Jagboi Jagboi on Mar 24, 2017

      @RobertRyan See lots of them in the oilpatch, especially the tool companies. All that steel in the tools is heavy, but doesn't need a physically larger truck. Or a wellhead/wellhead valves for example. Also as mentioned the hotshot companies, again hauling oilfield related supplies that can be heavy but not necessary large. In the spring they are a big advantage when the roadbans come on.

  • EquipmentJunkie EquipmentJunkie on Mar 23, 2017

    My brother and I spent a good part of the week researching an Ace of Base to tow a 30-ft. gooseneck flatbed. We're buying a new truck for a warranty. Base 3/4-ton, 4x4, regular cab diesel with carpet delete. We looked at Ford, GM, and Ram...and Nissan and Toyota just for literal laughs. Our equipment preferences put the Ford & GM very close in price. The Ram was a few thousand less...but the sticker price didn't mean anything to us. Modern HD pickup trucks are amazing machines. Powertrains for every brand are putting out numbers close to medium duty trucks of 15-20 years ago...and over double what my '94 diesel did. All brands are very similar in their capabilities. Therefore, the decision nearly always comes down to preferences: color, styling, dealer, seat, option, or the dreaded chrome. Our decision was pretty simple for our needs and prejudices. We will order a Ram Tradesman next week. Why? An inline-6 diesel and a transmission that requires three pedals. Ram is the only company that offers a manual transmission. Past experience with the Cummins and Powerstroke engines made the other decision easy.

    • See 5 previous
    • EquipmentJunkie EquipmentJunkie on Mar 24, 2017

      Update: My brother drove a Ford, GM, and Ram. Trying to be open-minded. GM is out of diesels until mid-summer. The dealer can't quote a price less than $500 off of sticker since incentives are only quoted at delivery. That means GM is $6-7K more than Ford or Ram...for a truck that might come in July at the earliest. The salesperson is very frustrated. Ram is getting very low on manual transmissions. Our dealer says that the rumor is that the manual option disappears next year.

  • TheMrFreeze So basically no manual transmissions in US cars after 2029.I just raised one finger in the general direction of NHTSB's main office. Guess which finger it is!
  • TheMrFreeze Wife drives a Fiat 500 Turbo 5-speed (135hp vs. 160 in the Abarth), it's a lot of fun to drive and hasn't given us any headaches. Maintenance on it is not as bad as you'd think for such a cramped engine compartment...Fiat did put some thought into it in that regard. Back seat is...cramped...but the front is surprisingly roomy for what it is.I honestly wouldn't mind having one myself, but yeah, gotta have a manual trans.
  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
  • Pig_Iron Stellantis is looking for excuses to close plants. Shawn Fain just gave them one. 🐹
  • SCE to AUX Unresolved safety issues are a good reason to strike.
Next