Ace of Base: 2017 Volkswagen Golf S

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Sometimes a manufacturer churns out a base trim that might not be the best of its range but represents a merciful departure from the rattletrap boxes of sadness which, not too many years ago, used to be hawked by OEMS as their base wheels. Here’s an example.

Sure, it’s easy to mock Volkswagen these days. The diesel emissions scandal has scuppered the brand in the eyes of a number of consumers, adding to traditional VW stereotypes such as high repair and maintenance costs. All the same, excluding an entire brand from consideration because of a single wayward trimline is akin to throwing out a fifty pound sack of potatoes because of one rotten spud.

In the past, Americans treated hatchbacks with a degree of disdain generally leveled at soiled copies of Utne Reader. The Golf is definitely one of the better hatchbacks out there. Does its base S model pass the Ace of Base litmus test?

Underneath the base Golf sits similar architecture to the much-lauded GTI and R. Sure, the particulars are different but the same MQB bones are there. No matter the trim, a Golf doesn’t exactly wallow around in corners. This is more than can be said for the majority of its competitors. The base S is shod with 15-inch tires, relative piano wheels compared to the jumbo hoops seen on most vehicles, but that just means owners can replace all four tires without taking out a second mortgage on the house. The generously proportioned sidewalls of the smaller diameter rubber also contributes to a ride quality that won’t shake your fillings loose on every freeway expansion joint.

Sharp headlight clusters incorporate a detail line which runs the length of the car. There’s a poised yet elegant appearance here, a stoic foil to the flamboyant Mazda 3. A raft of $0 colors ranging from Tornado Red to Silk Blue are on offer, in addition to traditional Teutonic hues on the greyscale. A direct-injected 1.8-liter TSI inline-four making 170 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of twist means the thing can more than get out of its own way, particularly when stirred by the standard five-speed manual transmission.

Those who sign the note on a $19,895 Golf S will not suffer for standard equipment. Power windows with one touch up/down are found in all four-doors, while the center stack features niceties like a backup camera and Bluetooth with streaming audio. Natty leather wraps the steering wheel and handbrake handle.

Mercifully, thanks to a small segment of buyers, they’ve enjoyed something of a resurgence. That manufacturers see fit to equip them better than the average battle-scarred penalty box in a run-down arena helps immensely in their acceptance. Hatchbacks are vastly practical and the Golf is no exception, easily swallowing a full-sized bicycle in a cargo compartment that measures a full 52.7 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down.

What do you think, B&B? Does the base Golf S help atone for the sins of its dirty diesel brother? Or are they all tarred with the same sooty brush?

Not every base model has aced it. The ones that have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 94 comments
  • StarAZ StarAZ on Dec 07, 2016

    First time I drove a TSI was Zipcar. I hadn't driven anything for months and the TSI made me jumping up and down with joy the whole weekend. The low-end torque made it extremely easy to drive in my local traffic. The car was soft and the ride was nice. My friend leased a GTI and he was happy. I'm considering getting a Golf R next year. If you factor in the currency exchange rate, the Golf R becomes a great deal in Canada (unlike a certain Japanese roadster).

    • See 1 previous
    • TDIandThen.... TDIandThen.... on Dec 08, 2016

      @JuniperBug I'm in Montreal too (hey!), and can't figure that out either. I did notice that the price difference between a GTI with Autobahn / Performance Pack, and an R, is not super-bigly, especially when the salesman phrases it in monthly payments. The one R owner I talked to said her husband was a 30-something programmer working for UbiSoft, and that he thought it was the most amazing thing ever while she was all like "whatever, it's a Golf." Also she didn't clean the snow off her car's roof, and people like that are a public hazard, so don't worry, I stabbed her to death.

  • WallMeerkat WallMeerkat on Dec 08, 2016

    Looks better equipped than other 'S' trims within the VW group, such as the SEAT Toledo (a European/Mexican badge engineered Skoda - a Czech brand owned by VW which may be introduced into the US as a budget brand to push VW further upmarket) which in 'S' trim while it has the now-standard electric windows and A/C, features steel wheels with plastic wheeltrims instead even of basic balloon alloys, even lacks front seat rear-pockets!! Where are we to keep our roadmaps that never get used and CDs that we forget about? The alloys can be remedied third party, but seat pockets - without a nasty third party 'seat organiser' cannot! Other visible external indicators that you went for poverty spec are the lack of front foglights, and no parking sensor dimples on the rear bumper. Interior, no rear arm rest that I always put down but any rear passengers always annoyingly put back up.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next