BMW Facing Lawsuit Over I3 REx Power Loss

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Owners of BMW i3s equipped with optional range extenders — read: two-cylinder engine that generates electricity — are suing the automaker for an issue that could leave those drivers going slow in the fast lane.

According to Green Car Reports, the BMW i3 REx will drop down to 45 miles per hour under certain conditions, which some owners believe is a safety issue.

The class-action lawsuit alleges the small range extender isn’t strong enough keep up with motivational demand at highway speeds when the battery is nearly depleted. Engine and battery management software steps in and reduces the BMW i3’s speed to 45 mph so that battery charge can catch up with demand.

“The BMW i3 Range Extender feature is a dangerous instrumentality to the owners of the vehicles and to other motorists on the road,” said Jonathan Michaels of MLG Automotive Law, the firm handling the class-action suit. “Having a sudden and unexpected loss of power in a motor vehicle can result in a catastrophic situation for all those on the road. These cars are dangerous and should not be driven.”

Green Car Reports notes three of its editors have experienced the issue in addition to its many owners.

The outlet spoke with electric-car advocate Tom Moloughney, who is also a BMW i3 owner. He stated the issue mostly comes down to a lack of knowledge of how the range extender works, and refrained from blaming the i3 for a quirk that doesn’t affect any other vehicle on sale today.

“The biggest problem is the lack of information on how the REx works at the dealership level. I think if people understood how the range-extender system works, then there would be fewer problems,” Moloughney said.

A representative for BMW said the company can’t comment on pending litigation.

The BMW i3 REx stickers, without options, for $47,245, including destination.

[Image: © 2015 Alex L. Dykes/The Truth About Cars]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 33 comments
  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on May 23, 2016

    The sooner the weenies that rent these new give up on them, the sooner they can fall into the hands of shade tree mechanics who can find out if there is potential for repowering their hideous carbon fiber shells with Hayabusa or K-series engines and giving them a reason for existing.

    • See 2 previous
    • Redmondjp Redmondjp on May 23, 2016

      @Old Man Pants Well, they make "range extenders" for that problem too. Now where is that empty gatorade bottle?

  • SunnyvaleCA SunnyvaleCA on May 23, 2016

    The i3 is crippled to comply with California "electric vehicle" silliness to get taxpayer funding and get single-occupant use of the carpool lanes. Part of the crippling is that the engine won't charge the battery more than some very small amount. So, when you're headed to Lake Tahoe and know full well that you'll be putting considerable demands on the propulsion unit, you can't tell the i3 to charge the battery to, say 50% before you get to the mountain climb.

  • Ajla I did like this one.
  • Zerofoo No, I won't miss this Chevrolet Malibu. It's a completely forgettable car. Who in their right mind would choose this over a V8 powered charger at the rental counter? Even the V6 charger is a far better drive.
  • Offbeat Oddity Nope, I won't miss it. I loved the 2008-2012 Malibu, but the subsequent generations couldn't hold a candle to it. I think the Impala was much more compelling at the end.
  • Zerofoo An almost 5000 pound hot hatch that fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down? No thanks.
  • Tassos Jong-iL This would still be a very nice car in North Korea.
Next