Guess Whose YouTube Channel Works Again?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

YouTube has finally processed our counterclaim to Volkswagen’s claim of copyright infringement. And guess what? YouTube’s copyright bots decided in our favor! I’m right chuffed about it.

What does that mean? Well, not so much for you, but it means we can do our jobs a bit more effectively. Also, it means David can still take on Goliath — and win.

It’s been over a month since we made our counterclaim against Volkswagen’s copyright infringement claim. Google’s Search servers might be lightning fast, but its process for sorting out a copyright claim for YouTube is arduously slow.

To celebrate our win, enjoy this soothing, Volkswagen infotainment B-roll. Ohhhh yeah.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 27 comments
  • Xeranar Xeranar on Mar 06, 2016

    This is increasingly becoming an issue as YT has to deal with more and more videos uploaded every minute. So for a short briefing: Youtube implemented this system in response to taking away their responsibility for the DMCA (a Republican favorite for you right-wingers out there). It isn't that the law is awful, it is to some extent, but rather that Google's solution is really awful. Basically they automated the system to bring down the copyright infringers faster and they do bring down SCORES OF THEM. The constant barrage of illegal posting is an issue but in the same breath sites like TTAC can be trolled by corporations for violations. It doesn't mean that TTAC can't or doesn't violate the rules at times but there needs to be a clear and separate path for 'official' channels that are accepted as monetized entities and present themselves as upright actors. This is happening to scores of internet reviewers, video game lets players, and the like that use established media to create new and interesting works. Until Youtube fixes this new trolls are going to spring up to steal revenue (since they allow all monetization to go to them until it gets reversed instead of escrow) and corporations are going to aggressively abuse it to the point where they'll continue to silence views they dislike.

    • See 1 previous
    • Xeranar Xeranar on Mar 06, 2016

      @VCplayer The core of DMCA is wholly in the neocon corporatist architecture. Democrats passed it in the era of Third-way approach so if that bill came back up it would likely suffer major changes or complete blockage. As it stands, it's really outmoded. It was a stop-gap measure when the internet was new and unfolding. It's going to need to change and Google's YT needs to shift how they make their complaint system work but that may end up costing some access to YT as other 3rd party video sites get more and more bandwidth access. Frankly, the system is wholly convoluted....

  • Ktm Ktm on Mar 06, 2016

    To add to Xeranar's post, there is (are) companies that do exactly this as a form of business - the file a copyright infringement claim against a channel and have it taken down while they then profit from the monetization of the same video. It takes Youtube MONTHS to resolve the claim, resulting in loss of revenue for the original channel and a boon for the trolling company. Said company does this against a multitude of channels, even if the content is purely original.

  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
  • Lou_BC Peak rocket esthetic in those taillights (last photo)
  • Lou_BC A pickup for most people would be a safe used car bet. Hard use/ abuse is relatively easy to spot and most people do not come close to using their full capabilities.
  • Lorenzo People don't want EVs, they want inexpensive vehicles. EVs are not that. To paraphrase the philosopher Yogi Berra: If people don't wanna buy 'em, how you gonna stop 'em?
Next